Literature DB >> 10195206

Pros and cons of open peer review.

.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10195206     DOI: 10.1038/6295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem.

Authors:  Peter Bacchetti
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-25

2.  Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal.

Authors:  E E O'Connor; M Cousar; J A Lentini; M Castillo; K Halm; T A Zeffiro
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Editorial Peer Reviewers as Shepherds, Rather Than Gatekeepers.

Authors:  Joel D Boerckel; Lilian I Plotkin; Natalie A Sims
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 6.390

Review 4.  Emerging trends in peer review-a survey.

Authors:  Richard Walker; Pascal Rocha da Silva
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Commentary on: Misrepresentation of Randomized Controlled Trials in Press Releases and News coverage: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Alexander J Fowler
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2013-05-18

6.  Gender bias in scholarly peer review.

Authors:  Markus Helmer; Manuel Schottdorf; Andreas Neef; Demian Battaglia
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Ten considerations for open peer review.

Authors:  Birgit Schmidt; Tony Ross-Hellauer; Xenia van Edig; Elizabeth C Moylan
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-06-29

8.  Should we open the reviewing process.

Authors:  Vladimir Mrša
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.918

9.  Peer Review in Law Journals.

Authors:  Jadranka Stojanovski; Elías Sanz-Casado; Tommaso Agnoloni; Ginevra Peruginelli
Journal:  Front Res Metr Anal       Date:  2021-12-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.