Literature DB >> 10195152

Top-down influences on stereoscopic depth-perception.

I Bülthoff1, H Bülthoff, P Sinha.   

Abstract

The interaction between depth perception and object recognition has important implications for the nature of mental object representations and models of hierarchical organization of visual processing. It is often believed that the computation of depth influences subsequent high-level object recognition processes, and that depth processing is an early vision task that is largely immune to 'top-down' object-specific influences, such as object recognition. Here we present experimental evidence that challenges both these assumptions in the specific context of stereoscopic depth-perception. We have found that observers' recognition of familiar dynamic three-dimensional (3D) objects is unaffected even when the objects' depth structure is scrambled, as long as their two-dimensional (2D) projections are unchanged. Furthermore, the observers seem perceptually unaware of the depth anomalies introduced by scrambling. We attribute the latter result to a top-down recognition-based influence whereby expectations about a familiar object's 3D structure override the true stereoscopic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10195152     DOI: 10.1038/699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  25 in total

1.  Apparent motion cues distort object localisation in egocentric space.

Authors:  Madeleine A Grealy; Yann Coello; Dorothy Heffernan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Imaging prior information in the brain.

Authors:  Scott Gorlin; Ming Meng; Jitendra Sharma; Hiroki Sugihara; Mriganka Sur; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Adaptive estimation of three-dimensional structure in the human brain.

Authors:  Tim J Preston; Zoe Kourtzi; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Determinants of Responsible Hiking Behavior: Results from a Stated Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Tian Guo; Jordan W Smith; Yu-Fai Leung; Erin Seekamp; Roger L Moore
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Self-recognition of avatar motion: how do I know it's me?

Authors:  Richard Cook; Alan Johnston; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Predictions Shape Confidence in Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus.

Authors:  Maxine T Sherman; Anil K Seth; Ryota Kanai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Ensemble coding of crowd speed using biological motion.

Authors:  Tram T N Nguyen; Quoc C Vuong; George Mather; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Bodily movement of approach is detected faster than that of receding.

Authors:  Hirokazu Doi; Kazuyuki Shinohara
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

9.  Anthropomorphism influences perception of computer-animated characters' actions.

Authors:  Thierry Chaminade; Jessica Hodgins; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 10.  Top-down influences on visual processing.

Authors:  Charles D Gilbert; Wu Li
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.