Literature DB >> 10194719

The carpal ligaments in MR arthrography of the wrist: correlation with standard MRI and wrist arthroscopy.

R J Scheck1, A Romagnolo, R Hierner, T Pfluger, K Wilhelm, K Hahn.   

Abstract

We assessed the value of three-compartment magnetic resonance (MR) wrist arthrography in comparison with non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of 13 individual wrist ligaments in 35 patients with refractory wrist pain. In 20 of these patients MR findings were correlated with the findings from multiportal wrist arthroscopy. For MR imaging (1.5-T magnet) a three-dimensional volume acquisition with a gradient-recalled echo sequence and 0.6-1.0 mm effective slice thickness was used. The delineation of individual wrist ligaments was rated as "good" in 10% of non-enhanced MR and 90% of MR arthrography images. Ligament evaluation was possible with high diagnostic confidence in 11% by non-enhanced MR imaging and 90% by MR arthrography. With wrist arthroscopy as the standard of reference, average sensitivities/specificities/accuracies for the diagnosis of full-thickness ligamentous defects were 0.81/0.75/0.77 for non-enhanced MR imaging and 0.97/0.96/0.96 for MR arthrography. Our findings suggest that MR arthrography is more accurate than standard MRI in delineating and evaluating the ligaments of the wrist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10194719     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(199903)9:3<468::aid-jmri16>3.0.co;2-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  21 in total

1.  Intrinsic ligament and triangular fibrocartilage complex tears of the wrist: comparison of MDCT arthrography, conventional 3-T MRI, and MR arthrography.

Authors:  Ryan K L Lee; Alex W H Ng; Cina S L Tong; James F Griffith; W L Tse; C Wong; P C Ho
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Diagnostic performance of wrist magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography: comparison of three-dimensional isotropic T1 weighted fast spin-echo MR arthrography and two-dimensional MR arthrography.

Authors:  Eunsun Oh; Young C Yoon; Min J Park
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  [Ligament injuries of the wrist].

Authors:  R Schmitt
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  TFCC Injuries: Meta-Analysis and Comparison of Diagnostic Imaging Modalities.

Authors:  Matthew D Treiser; Kayva Crawford; Matthew L Iorio
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2018-02-14

5.  Role of MR imaging in chronic wrist pain.

Authors:  Marco Zanetti; Nadja Saupe; Ladislav Nagy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Intrinsic carpal ligaments on MR and multidetector CT arthrography: comparison of axial and axial oblique planes.

Authors:  Ryan K L Lee; James F Griffith; Alex W H Ng; Eric K C Law; W L Tse; Clara W Y Wong; P C Ho
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Imaging of the wrist at 1.5 Tesla using isotropic three-dimensional fast spin echo cube.

Authors:  Kathryn J Stevens; Charles G Wallace; Weitian Chen; Jarrett K Rosenberg; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  MR imaging of the traumatic triangular fibrocartilaginous complex tear.

Authors:  Alex W H Ng; James F Griffith; Cindy S Y Fung; Ryan K L Lee; Cina S L Tong; Clara W Y Wong; Wing Lim Tse; Pak Cheong Ho
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-08

Review 9.  Anatomy and injuries of the pediatric wrist: beyond the basics.

Authors:  Ezekiel Maloney; Andrew M Zbojniewicz; Jie Nguyen; Yu Luo; Mahesh M Thapa
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-03-20

10.  Depiction of the triangular fibro-cartilage in patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain: comparison of direct multi-slice CT arthrography and direct MR arthrography.

Authors:  Georg Omlor; Martin Jung; Thomas Grieser; Karl Ludwig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.