Literature DB >> 10194289

Treatment and posttreatment effects of acrylic splint Herbst appliance therapy.

L Franchi1, T Baccetti, J A McNamara.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the skeletal and dentoalveolar changes induced by acrylic splint Herbst therapy of Class II malocclusion. The treated group comprised 55 subjects with Class II malocclusion treated with the acrylic splint Herbst appliance followed by comprehensive edgewise therapy. The mean age at Time 1 (immediately before treatment) was 12 years and 10 months +/- 1 year and 2 months. The mean age at Time 2 (immediately after debonding of the Herbst appliance) and Time 3 (posttreatment) was 13 years and 10 months +/- 1 year and 2 months and 15 years and 2 months +/- 1 year and 4 months, respectively. The two control groups were one group of 30 subjects with untreated Class II malocclusion and another group of 33 subjects with Class I occlusion. The three groups were homogeneous as to the stage of maturation of cervical vertebrae at all observation times. A modification of Pancherz's cephalometric analysis was applied to the lateral cephalograms of the three groups at Time 1, Time 2, and Time 3. Linear and angular measurements for mandibular dimensions, cranial base angulation, and vertical relationships were added to the original analysis. Differences for all the variables from Time 1 to Time 2 (active treatment effects), from Time 2 to Time 3 (posttreatment effects), and from Time 1 to Time 3 (overall treatment effects) were calculated for the treated group and contrasted to corresponding differences of both untreated groups by means of ANOVA (P <.05). The study showed that two thirds of the achieved occlusal correction was due to skeletal effects and only one third to dentoalveolar adaptations. Both skeletal and dentoalveolar effects were due mainly to changes in mandibular structures. A significant amount of relapse in molar relationship occurred during the posttreatment period, and this change could be ascribed to the mesial movement of the upper molars.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10194289     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70264-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  18 in total

1.  A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance.

Authors:  Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Jörg Alexander Lisson; Linda Frye; Ulrich Gross; Jan Hourfar
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vasileios F Zymperdikas; Vasiliki Koretsi; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Moschos A Papadopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The cervical vertebral maturation method: A user's guide.

Authors:  James A McNamara; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Dental and skeletal changes in patients with mandibular retrognathism following treatment with Herbst and pre-adjusted fixed appliance.

Authors:  Fabio de Abreu Vigorito; Gladys Cristina Dominguez; Luís Antônio de Arruda Aidar
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

5.  Short-term dentoskeletal changes following Class II treatment using a fixed functional appliance: the Austro Repositioner : A pilot study.

Authors:  M Dolores Austro; Encarnación González; M Angustias Peñalver; Domingo Pérez; José Antonio Alarcón
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients with different vertical facial patterns treated with the Herbst appliance.

Authors:  Arjun Atresh; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Marilia Yatabe; Luciana Muniz; Tung Nguyen; Brent Larson; David J Manton; Paul M Schneider
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Control of mandibular incisors with the combined Herbst and completely customized lingual appliance--a pilot study.

Authors:  Dirk Wiechmann; Rainer Schwestka-Polly; Hans Pancherz; Ariane Hohoff
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Assessment of Skeletal Maturation in Concordance to Statural Height and Body Weight in 12-Year-Old Children - A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Vikram Vishwanath Krishnamoorthy; Ratna Parameswaran; Devaki Vijayalakshmi; Nayeemullah Khan; Arani Nandakumar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-06-01

9.  The effectiveness of the Herbst appliance for patients with Class II malocclusion: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xin Yang; Yafen Zhu; Hu Long; Yang Zhou; Fan Jian; Niansong Ye; Meiya Gao; Wenli Lai
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Prediction of lower incisor proclination during Xbow treatment based on initial cephalometric variables.

Authors:  Tehnia Aziz; Usama Nassar; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.