BACKGROUND: Genetic heterogeneity is a well-known feature of Alport syndrome (AS). Most families with AS show an X-linked dominant pattern of inheritance but about 15% of families show an autosomal inheritance of the disease. Autosomal recessive AS may account for 10% of the total number of cases and is caused by mutations in the COL4A3 and COL4A4 genes. The clinical spectrum of this rare disorder has not been well clarified. METHODS: We present two families with AS. Two affected members of these families have entered end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in their 30s, and the other three are older than 15 years and have normal serum creatinine. Four of the five patients have deafness but none have ocular abnormalities. Two have been transplanted and have not suffered from anti-GBM antibody nephritis. Men and women are equally affected. We have performed linkage analysis for chromosome 2 with the following markers: D2S279, COL4A3/4 DNTR, COL4A4 RFLP Hae III. RESULTS: We demonstrate that both families, one of them consanguineous, are linked to the COL4A3/4 locus. CONCLUSIONS: We can conclude that the only significant difference between the X-linked and the autosomal recessive forms of AS lies in the fact that in the latter females are as affected as males; thus the idea that autosomal recessive AS causes ESRD during childhood must be discarded. Other clinical features such as age of deafness or the presence of post-transplant anti-GBM antibody nephritis show no differences between the entities. Thus an accurate familial study is mandatory in patients with AS, as the identification of the different patterns of inheritance may cause a great difference in genetic counselling. Linkage analysis is the only effective molecular diagnosis that can be performed nowadays.
BACKGROUND: Genetic heterogeneity is a well-known feature of Alport syndrome (AS). Most families with AS show an X-linked dominant pattern of inheritance but about 15% of families show an autosomal inheritance of the disease. Autosomal recessive AS may account for 10% of the total number of cases and is caused by mutations in the COL4A3 and COL4A4 genes. The clinical spectrum of this rare disorder has not been well clarified. METHODS: We present two families with AS. Two affected members of these families have entered end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in their 30s, and the other three are older than 15 years and have normal serum creatinine. Four of the five patients have deafness but none have ocular abnormalities. Two have been transplanted and have not suffered from anti-GBM antibody nephritis. Men and women are equally affected. We have performed linkage analysis for chromosome 2 with the following markers: D2S279, COL4A3/4 DNTR, COL4A4 RFLP Hae III. RESULTS: We demonstrate that both families, one of them consanguineous, are linked to the COL4A3/4 locus. CONCLUSIONS: We can conclude that the only significant difference between the X-linked and the autosomal recessive forms of AS lies in the fact that in the latter females are as affected as males; thus the idea that autosomal recessive AS causes ESRD during childhood must be discarded. Other clinical features such as age of deafness or the presence of post-transplant anti-GBM antibody nephritis show no differences between the entities. Thus an accurate familial study is mandatory in patients with AS, as the identification of the different patterns of inheritance may cause a great difference in genetic counselling. Linkage analysis is the only effective molecular diagnosis that can be performed nowadays.