Literature DB >> 10193726

Guidelines for surgical standby for coronary angioplasty: should they be changed?

P Angelini.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10193726     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00002-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Impact of the "stent-when-feasible" policy on in-hospital and 6-month success and complication rates after coronary angioplasty: single-center experience with 17,956 revascularization procedures (1993-1997).

Authors:  P Angelini; W K Vaughn; M Zaqqa; J M Wilson; R D Fish
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2000

2.  On-site surgical standby for percutaneous coronary intervention: a thing of the past?

Authors:  Mark A de Belder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery standby.

Authors:  Jörg Carlsson; Stefan N James; Elisabeth Ståhle; Sebastian Höfer; Bo Lagerqvist
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  In-hospital outcomes after elective and non-elective percutaneous coronary interventions in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery backup.

Authors:  Ulrich Tebbe; Matthias Hochadel; Peter Bramlage; Sebastian Kerber; Rainer Hambrecht; Eberhard Grube; Karl E Hauptmann; Martin Gottwik; Albrecht Elsässer; Hans-Georg Glunz; Tassilo Bonzel; Jörg Carlsson; Uwe Zeymer; Ralf Zahn; Jochen Senges
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  The mobile angiograph in a center without on-site surgical back-up: the de facto standard?

Authors:  Walid Hassan; Suleiman Kharabsheh
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.