Literature DB >> 10193222

Severity of illness scoring systems and performance appraisal.

S Ridley1.   

Abstract

A large number of severity of illness scoring systems have been developed and they are widely used in intensive care practice. However, they are complex systems with their basis in mathematics. To use such systems effectively, it is important to appreciate what factors influence their performance so that they can be compared fairly and used most appropriately. The purpose of this review is to describe the methods commonly used to assess the various facets of performance in severity of illness scoring systems. The performance of the most frequently used scoring systems in adult intensive care practice are presented. The shortfalls, misuse and strengths of scoring systems are also discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10193222     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00615.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  7 in total

1.  Perioperative mortality and morbidity prediction using POSSUM, P-POSSUM and APACHE II in Chinese gastric cancer patients: surgical method is a key independent factor affecting prognosis.

Authors:  Yantian Fang; Chunhsien Wu; Xiaodong Gu; Zhengyang Li; Jianbin Xiang; Zongyou Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Association of critical illness scores (q-SOFA and APACHE) and multimorbidity in patients admitted to internal medicine step down units.

Authors:  Sher Sethi; Madiha Iqbal; Amber Sabeen; Sania Sabir; Aysha Almas
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.659

3.  Mortality prediction using SAPS II: an update for French intensive care units.

Authors:  Jean Roger Le Gall; Anke Neumann; François Hemery; Jean Pierre Bleriot; Jean Pierre Fulgencio; Bernard Garrigues; Christian Gouzes; Eric Lepage; Pierre Moine; Daniel Villers
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Better prognostic marker in ICU - APACHE II, SOFA or SAP II!

Authors:  Iftikhar Haider Naqvi; Khalid Mahmood; Syed Ziaullaha; Syed Mohammad Kashif; Asim Sharif
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  Prognostic performance of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II in major Croatian hospitals: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Kristian Desa; Mladen Peric; Ino Husedzinovic; Alan Sustic; Andelko Korusic; Vjekoslav Karadza; Drazen Matlekovic; Branka Prstec-Veronek; Marta Zuvic-Butorac; Jadranko Sokolic; Mladen Siranovic; Danica Bosnjak; Jasna Spicek-Macan; Denis Gustin; Drazenka Ozeg-Jakopovic
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.351

6.  Predicting six-month mortality of patients with traumatic brain injury: usefulness of common intensive care severity scores.

Authors:  Rahul Raj; Markus Skrifvars; Stepani Bendel; Tuomas Selander; Riku Kivisaari; Jari Siironen; Matti Reinikainen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 7.  Performance of critical care prognostic scoring systems in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rashan Haniffa; Ilhaam Isaam; A Pubudu De Silva; Arjen M Dondorp; Nicolette F De Keizer
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.