Literature DB >> 10192010

Self presentation and cardiovascular reactivity.

T R Hartley1, G P Ginsburg, K Heffner.   

Abstract

This research was concerned with two issues: first, whether cardiovascular response patterns to a social stressor (i.e. self-presentation under evaluative circumstances) differ as a function of one's ability to control the impression one makes on others; second, whether cognitive appraisals are necessary or sufficient for the cardiovascular components of emotional arousal. Forty-two male subjects (Ss), monitored for cardiac impedance and blood pressure, were shown a previously recorded videotape of themselves in which each S verbally described personal aspects about himself. Ss in an Active condition were allowed to mark segments of the tape they wanted to re-shoot before the tape was evaluated by reviewers. Ss in a Passive condition viewed their tape but could not indicate whether to revise it. Control conditions allowed assessment of the activity entailed in tape marking and of evaluation per se. Self-reports of stress, threat, and coping ability regarding the upcoming task were taken. Blood pressure elevations occurred equally in both experimental conditions, but apparently through different underlying mechanisms. The Active condition produced myocardial responses (increased ejection fraction), while the Passive condition produced a vascular response (increased total peripheral resistance). However, while cardiovascular reactivity patterns did differ as a function of the opportunity to control the impression one could make on evaluative others, they did not differ as a function of having appraised the task as a challenge or as a threat. Consideration also is given to the conditions necessary for cognitive appraisal to occur and to influence reactivity.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10192010     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(99)00003-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  2 in total

1.  Older adults' hemodynamic responses to an acute emotional stressor: short report.

Authors:  Kathi L Heffner; Paul G Devereux; H Mei Ng; Amy R Borchardt; Karen S Quigley
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  Student engagement, assessed using heart rate, shows no reset following active learning sessions in lectures.

Authors:  Diana K Darnell; Paul A Krieg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.