Literature DB >> 10191740

The effect of hospital-type and operating volume on the survival of hip replacements. A review of 39,505 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 1988-1996.

B Espehaug1, L I Havelin, L B Engesaeter, S E Vollset.   

Abstract

We investigated associations between the survival of total hip replacements (THRs), type of hospital and annual number of THRs per hospital. The study was based on 39,505 primary THRs reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 45 local (n 20,756), 15 central (n 12,455) and 10 university hospitals (n 6,294) during 1988-1996. The annual number of THRs was highest at central and university hospitals, both of which are training hospitals. University hospitals were further characterized by the lowest mean annual number of THRs performed per surgeon. For cemented THRs, with adjustment for gender, age, diagnosis, surgical procedure, and annual hospital volume, the revision rates at central and university hospitals were 0.8 (95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.95) and 1.2 (CI: 1.02-1.47) times that of local hospitals, respectively. A high annual number of cemented THRs per hospital was not associated with lower revision rates. In uncemented THRs, survival results were similar in central and local hospitals, whereas the adjusted revision rate at university hospitals was 1.6 (CI: 1.13-2.19) times that of local hospitals. The adjusted 6.5 year revision probability was 12% in hospitals performing < or = 10 uncemented THRs per year (n 606), 8% in hospitals performing from 18-28 operations (n 1,378) and 5% in hospitals performing > 84 operations (n 526).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10191740     DOI: 10.3109/17453679909000949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  5 in total

1.  Choice of hospital for revision total hip replacement.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Elizabeth A Wright; John Wright; Kelly L Corbett; Henrik Malchau; John A Baron; Elena Losina
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Early complications of total hip and knee replacement: a comparison of outcomes in a regional orthopaedic hospital and two independent treatment centres.

Authors:  Gordon Bannister; Mansoor Ahmed; Miles Bannister; Rachel Bray; Paul Dillon; Stephen Eastaugh-Waring
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Good results with cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients between 40 and 50 years of age.

Authors:  Daniël C J de Kam; Jean W M Gardeniers; René P H Veth; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Introduction of total knee arthroplasty in Lithuania: Results from the first 10 years.

Authors:  Sarunas Tarasevicius; Justinas Stucinskas; Otto Robertsson; Hans Wingstrand
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Effect of hospital volume on outcomes of total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Syed Hamza Mufarrih; Muhammad Owais Abdul Ghani; Russell Seth Martins; Nada Qaisar Qureshi; Sayyeda Aleena Mufarrih; Azeem Tariq Malik; Shahryar Noordin
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 2.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.