Literature DB >> 10191035

Sugars exert a major influence on the vitrification properties of ethylene glycol-based solutions and have low toxicity to embryos and oocytes.

L L Kuleshova1, D R MacFarlane, A O Trounson, J M Shaw.   

Abstract

A systematic approach was taken to assess the vitrification properties of ethylene glycol-based solutions supplemented with carbohydrates. Solutions were prepared by weight (gravimetrically) using ethylene glycol as the cryoprotectant, 0.9% NaCl in water, and six different sugars: d-glucose, d(-)-fructose, d-sorbitol, sucrose, d(+)-trehalose, and raffinose. Sugars were added on a molal basis (0. 1, 0.5, and 1 m). Characteristics of the solutions were measured during warming by differential scanning calorimetry using a cooling rate of 100 degrees C/min and a warming rate of 10 degrees C/min. In the absence of carbohydrates a 59 wt% EG-saline solution formed a stable glass. When EG was replaced by an equimolal concentration of glucose, fructose, or sorbitol (monosaccharides) at 0.1, 0.5, or 1.0 m there was no change in the total solute concentration at which vitrification occurred, but the glass transition (Tg) occurred at a higher temperature than in EG-saline alone. When EG was replaced by an equimolal concentration of sucrose or trehalose (disaccharides) both the Tg and the lowest total solute concentration required for vitrification became progressively higher as the molecular weight, or the ratio of sugar to EG in the solutions, increased. At the highest tested disaccharide concentration (1 m) vitrification was achieved at a total solute concentration of 65 wt% (sucrose) and 67 wt% (trehalose). The polysaccharide raffinose significantly modified the vitrification properties of ethylene glycol solutions. When 0.5 or 0.1 m raffinose replaced EG on an equimolal basis the glass transition point was raised more than with either the monosaccharides or the disaccharides. Raffinose allowed vitrification at a total solute concentration of 67 wt% (0.5 m) and 63 wt% (0.1 m). The maturation of immature mouse oocytes, and the development of embryos in media containing 5-7 mM of any sugar was comparable to controls, indicating that they are not toxic. Exposure of freshly collected GV or MII oocytes to sugar concentrations between 0.5 and 1.0 M, for up to 10 min had no significant effect on the proportion which subsequently formed two cells. We conclude that added sugars do contribute to a solutions overall vitrification properties, and their properties should be taken into consideration when vitrification solutions are being designed or modified. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10191035     DOI: 10.1006/cryo.1999.2153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cryobiology        ISSN: 0011-2240            Impact factor:   2.487


  23 in total

1.  In vitro culture of mouse GV oocytes and preantral follicles isolated from ovarian tissues cryopreserved by vitrification.

Authors:  Miwa Segino; Mario Ikeda; Sigeru Aoki; Yuko Tokieda; Fumiki Hirahara; Kahei Sato
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.174

2.  Preservation and transplantation of porcine testis tissue.

Authors:  W Zeng; A K Snedaker; S Megee; R Rathi; F Chen; A Honaramooz; I Dobrinski
Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Preservation of stem cells.

Authors:  Jacob Hanna; Allison Hubel
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Freeze thaw: a simple approach for prediction of optimal cryoprotectant for freeze drying.

Authors:  Praveen V Date; Abdul Samad; Padma V Devarajan
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Cytotoxicity effects of cryoprotectants as single-component and cocktail vitrification solutions.

Authors:  Alison Lawson; Hajira Ahmad; Athanassios Sambanis
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 2.487

6.  Effect of vitrification on mitochondrial membrane potential in human metaphase II oocytes.

Authors:  Cui Chen; Shubiao Han; Weiwei Liu; Yaping Wang; Guoning Huang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Cryoprotectant Toxicity: Facts, Issues, and Questions.

Authors:  Benjamin P Best
Journal:  Rejuvenation Res       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.663

8.  Principles of Ice-Free Cryopreservation by Vitrification.

Authors:  Gregory M Fahy; Brian Wowk
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

9.  Influence of Cryopreservation Solution on the In Vitro Culture of Skin Tissues Derived from Collared Peccary (Pecari tajacu Linnaeus, 1758).

Authors:  Alana A Borges; Gabriela P O Lira; Lucas E Nascimento; Luiza B Queiroz Neta; Maria V O Santos; Moacir F Oliveira; Alexandre R Silva; Alexsandra F Pereira
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 10.  Human oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation and its application.

Authors:  Tao Tao; Alfonso Del Valle
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.