Literature DB >> 10190988

Discourse deficits following right hemisphere damage in deaf signers.

G Hickok1, M Wilson, K Clark, E S Klima, M Kritchevsky, U Bellugi.   

Abstract

Previous findings have demonstrated that hemispheric organization in deaf users of American Sign Language (ASL) parallels that of the hearing population, with the left hemisphere showing dominance for grammatical linguistic functions and the right hemisphere showing specialization for non-linguistic spatial functions. The present study addresses two further questions: first, do extra-grammatical discourse functions in deaf signers show the same right-hemisphere dominance observed for discourse functions in hearing subjects; and second, do discourse functions in ASL that employ spatial relations depend upon more general intact spatial cognitive abilities? We report findings from two right-hemisphere damaged deaf signers, both of whom show disruption of discourse functions in absence of any disruption of grammatical functions. The exact nature of the disruption differs for the two subjects, however. Subject AR shows difficulty in maintaining topical coherence, while SJ shows difficulty in employing spatial discourse devices. Further, the two subjects are equally impaired on non-linguistic spatial tasks, indicating that spared spatial discourse functions can occur even when more general spatial cognition is disrupted. We conclude that, as in the hearing population, discourse functions involve the right hemisphere; that distinct discourse functions can be dissociated from one another in ASL; and that brain organization for linguistic spatial devices is driven by its functional role in language processing, rather than by its surface, spatial characteristics. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10190988     DOI: 10.1006/brln.1998.1995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  7 in total

1.  Characteristics of the structure of the speech motor cortex of the frontal area of the brain of a deaf mute child.

Authors:  I N Bogolepova; L I Malofeeva; T V Belogrud'
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-02

2.  Neural systems supporting linguistic structure, linguistic experience, and symbolic communication in sign language and gesture.

Authors:  Aaron J Newman; Ted Supalla; Nina Fernandez; Elissa L Newport; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Prosodic and narrative processing in American Sign Language: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Aaron J Newman; Ted Supalla; Peter C Hauser; Elissa L Newport; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Factor structure of the BPRS in deaf people with schizophrenia: correlates to language and thought.

Authors:  Heather K Horton; Steven M Silverstein
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychiatry       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 1.871

5.  Cognition and functional outcome among deaf and hearing people with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Heather K Horton; Steven M Silverstein
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Cross-linguistic differences in the neural representation of human language: evidence from users of signed languages.

Authors:  David P Corina; Laurel A Lawyer; Deborah Cates
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-02

7.  Psycholinguistic mechanisms of classifier processing in sign language.

Authors:  Julia Krebs; Evie Malaia; Ronnie B Wilbur; Dietmar Roehm
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.140

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.