Literature DB >> 10190636

Aggregation and the measurement of income inequality: effects on morbidity.

M J Soobader1, F B LeClere.   

Abstract

This is a cross-sectional study using records from the National Health Interview Survey linked to Census geography. The sample is restricted to white males ages 25-64 in the United States from three years (1989-1991) of the National Health Interview Survey. Perceived health is used to measure morbidity. Individual covariates include income-to-needs ratio, education and occupation. Contextual level measures of income inequality, median household income and percent in poverty are constructed at the US census county and tract level. The association between inequality and morbidity is examined using logistic regression models. Income inequality is found to exert an independent adverse effect on self-rated health at the county level, controlling for individual socioeconomic status and median income or percent poverty in the county. This corresponding effect at the tract level is reduced. Median income or percent poverty and individual socioeconomic status are the dominant correlates of perceived health status at the tract level. These results suggest that the level of geographic aggregation influences the pathways through which income inequality is actualized into an individuals' morbidity risk. At higher levels of aggregation there are independent effects of income inequality, while at lower levels of aggregation, income inequality is mediated by the neighborhood consequences of income inequality and individual processes.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10190636     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00401-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  58 in total

1.  What is the difference between controlling for mean versus median income in analyses of income inequality?

Authors:  T A Blakely; I Kawachi
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Social context and geographic patterns of homicide among US black and white males.

Authors:  C Cubbin; L W Pickle; L Fingerhut
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Relation between income inequality and mortality in Canada and in the United States: cross sectional assessment using census data and vital statistics.

Authors:  N A Ross; M C Wolfson; J R Dunn; J M Berthelot; G A Kaplan; J W Lynch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-01

4.  Individual income, income inequality, health, and mortality: what are the relationships?

Authors:  K Fiscella; P Franks
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Ecological effects in multi-level studies.

Authors:  T A Blakely; A J Woodward
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 6.  Income inequality and mortality: importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions.

Authors:  J W Lynch; G D Smith; G A Kaplan; J S House
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-29

7.  The effect of income inequality on the health of selected US demographic groups.

Authors:  F B LeClere; M J Soobader
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Socioeconomic inequality in voting participation and self-rated health.

Authors:  T A Blakely; B P Kennedy; I Kawachi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Income inequality and population health.

Authors:  Johan P Mackenbach
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-05

10.  Income inequality and mortality in US counties: does minority racial concentration matter?

Authors:  Diane K McLaughlin; C Shannon Stokes
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.