Literature DB >> 10190411

Functional evaluation of extracardiac ventriculopulmonary conduits and of the right ventricle with magnetic resonance imaging and velocity mapping.

C Holmqvist1, G Oskarsson, F Ståhlberg, U Thilén, G Björkhem, S Laurin.   

Abstract

Extracardiac ventriculopulmonary conduits tend to deteriorate over time, developing both obstruction and regurgitation. In this prospective study, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was compared with Doppler echocardiography to determine whether MRI improves the noninvasive evaluation of conduit patients. Twenty-five patients (median age 10 years, range 2.5 to 32) were investigated 27 times with Doppler echocardiography and an MRI protocol with spin echo sequences for morphology, velocity mapping, and multislice gradient echo technique for right ventricular volume measuring. Cardiac catheterization data were available in 6 patients. Echocardiography could assess the morphology of the conduits in 6 patients, whereas MRI demonstrated all conduits efficiently. Doppler echocardiography could evaluate the occurrence of regurgitation in 18 patients and could quantify peak velocity in 20 of the patients. A technically adequate MRI velocity mapping was obtained in 25 patients. There was good agreement between MRI and Doppler echocardiography in establishing or not establishing regurgitation, but Doppler echocardiography was less reliable in evaluating the degree of regurgitation. The correlation between peak velocity determined with Doppler and magnetic resonance imaging was r = 0.63 [corrected]. Correlations between catheterization pressure gradients and noninvasive techniques were r = 0.97 for magnetic resonance imaging [corrected] versus catheterization, and r = 0.86 [corrected] for Doppler versus catheterization. MRI can provide complete information on the morphology and function of extracardiac ventriculopulmonary conduits, as well as of the right ventricle. If the results of MRI and echocardiography with Doppler are in agreement, heart catheterization and angiography can be avoided, even in patients considered for conduit replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10190411     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)01060-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Real-time color-flow CMR in adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Erasmo de la Pena; Patricia K Nguyen; Krishna S Nayak; Phillip C Yang; David N Rosenthal; Bob S Hu; John M Pauly; Michael V McConnell
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.364

2.  Volumetric velocity measurements in restricted geometries using spiral sampling: a phantom study.

Authors:  Anders Nilsson; Johan Revstedt; Einar Heiberg; Freddy Ståhlberg; Karin Markenroth Bloch
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Guidelines and protocols for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children and adults with congenital heart disease: SCMR expert consensus group on congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Sohrab Fratz; Taylor Chung; Gerald F Greil; Margaret M Samyn; Andrew M Taylor; Emanuela R Valsangiacomo Buechel; Shi-Joon Yoo; Andrew J Powell
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Appropriate use criteria for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR): SIC-SIRM position paper part 1 (ischemic and congenital heart diseases, cardio-oncology, cardiac masses and heart transplant).

Authors:  Gianluca Pontone; Ernesto Di Cesare; Silvia Castelletti; Francesco De Cobelli; Manuel De Lazzari; Antonio Esposito; Marta Focardi; Paolo Di Renzi; Ciro Indolfi; Chiara Lanzillo; Luigi Lovato; Viviana Maestrini; Giuseppe Mercuro; Luigi Natale; Cesare Mantini; Aldo Polizzi; Mark Rabbat; Francesco Secchi; Aurelio Secinaro; Giovanni Donato Aquaro; Andrea Barison; Marco Francone
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.469

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.