INTRODUCTION: Digital rotational angiography is a technique characterized by a C-arm acquiring images as it rapidly rotates around the patient. We studied the clinical potentials of this technique in the assessment of vascular diseases of the abdominal aorta and of the carotid, lower limbs and renal arteries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We examined 108 patients (66 men and 42 women; mean age: 54.3 years, range: 34-69): 42 had vascular diseases in the carotid arteries, 47 in the abdominal aorta and lower limbs and 19 in the renal arteries. All the patients underwent digital rotational and non-rotational angiography and we analyzed the diagnostic yield, amount of contrast agent and the utility of additional views for each technique. All the examinations were reviewed with(out) subtraction, in cine-loop mode and frame by frame, as well as with(out) magnification. Finally, we considered background noise in both rotational and non-rotational images. RESULTS: The diagnostic quality of the digital rotational technique was always the same as or superior to that of the non-rotational technique. The former allows better 3D rendering, especially when viewed in the cine-loop mode; the examination is shorter and less contrast agent is needed. In contrast, image noise was increased, especially in lateral and oblique views. Digital rotational angiography was fairly well tolerated but the long breath-hold required was a problem especially to elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: Digital rotational angiography is a useful tool to study vascular diseases in the carotid arteries and lower limbs using a lower radiation dose and less contrast agent than non-rotational examinations. As for the abdominal aorta and renal arteries, the rotational technique can be a valid adjunct to the conventional one.
INTRODUCTION: Digital rotational angiography is a technique characterized by a C-arm acquiring images as it rapidly rotates around the patient. We studied the clinical potentials of this technique in the assessment of vascular diseases of the abdominal aorta and of the carotid, lower limbs and renal arteries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We examined 108 patients (66 men and 42 women; mean age: 54.3 years, range: 34-69): 42 had vascular diseases in the carotid arteries, 47 in the abdominal aorta and lower limbs and 19 in the renal arteries. All the patients underwent digital rotational and non-rotational angiography and we analyzed the diagnostic yield, amount of contrast agent and the utility of additional views for each technique. All the examinations were reviewed with(out) subtraction, in cine-loop mode and frame by frame, as well as with(out) magnification. Finally, we considered background noise in both rotational and non-rotational images. RESULTS: The diagnostic quality of the digital rotational technique was always the same as or superior to that of the non-rotational technique. The former allows better 3D rendering, especially when viewed in the cine-loop mode; the examination is shorter and less contrast agent is needed. In contrast, image noise was increased, especially in lateral and oblique views. Digital rotational angiography was fairly well tolerated but the long breath-hold required was a problem especially to elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: Digital rotational angiography is a useful tool to study vascular diseases in the carotid arteries and lower limbs using a lower radiation dose and less contrast agent than non-rotational examinations. As for the abdominal aorta and renal arteries, the rotational technique can be a valid adjunct to the conventional one.