Literature DB >> 10189813

Emotional response of participants to a mental health survey.

P A Jacomb1, A F Jorm, B Rodgers, A E Korten, A S Henderson, H Christensen.   

Abstract

Following participation in a mental health survey of 2725 adults aged 18-79, respondents were asked if the questionnaire had made them feel distressed or depressed, and if it had been an intrusion on privacy or had made them feel good about themselves. While 5% reported feeling distressed, 3% depressed and 3% were concerned about privacy, 35% reported feeling good about themselves. The participants reporting negative feelings were more likely to be younger women, to be higher on negative personality measures, to report more anxiety and depression symptoms, and to have had more childhood adversity and lower social support. Those who reported positive feelings had higher positive personality scores, more social support and lower anxiety and depression. This group was more likely to be older women. Despite the sensitive nature of many of the questions, only a small percentage of respondents reported distress, while many found that the questionnaire had made them feel good about themselves. This is important information to present to Institutional Ethics Committees and to future participants in such studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10189813     DOI: 10.1007/s001270050115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol        ISSN: 0933-7954            Impact factor:   4.328


  8 in total

1.  Participation in a trauma-focused epidemiological investigation may result in sensitization for current health problems.

Authors:  Margot J Verschuur; Philip Spinhoven; Arnold A P van Emmerik; Frits R Rosendaal
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  The risk-benefit ratio of studying psychiatric symptoms via daily diary methods.

Authors:  Caitlin Wolford-Clevenger; Mickeah J Hugley; James McNulty; Lawrence Christian Elledge; Karen Cropsey; Gregory L Stuart
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  It doesn't cost anything just to ask, does it? The ethics of questionnaire-based research.

Authors:  M Evans; M Robling; F Maggs Rapport; H Houston; P Kinnersley; C Wilkinson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 4.  Recognising domestic violence in clinical practice using the diagnoses of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression and low self-esteem.

Authors:  Fiona Duxbury
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Psychometric properties of an automated telephone-based PHQ-9.

Authors:  Ramesh Farzanfar; Timothy Hereen; Joseph Fava; Jillian Davis; Louis Vachon; Robert Friedman
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.536

6.  Damon or Pandora?

Authors:  V F Maher
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2000

7.  Perceptions of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) among women in an HIV-positive prevention program.

Authors:  Larissa J Estes; Linda E Lloyd; Michelle Teti; Sheela Raja; Lisa Bowleg; Kristi L Allgood; Nancy Glick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Research risk for persons with psychiatric disorders: a decisional framework to meet the ethical challenge.

Authors:  Philip T Yanos; Barbara S Stanley; Carolyn S Greene
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.157

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.