OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of diabetes care at a national level in Finland, using level of glycemia as a determinant of success in treatment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Physicians and diabetes nurses in 76 randomly selected clinics (59 primary care units and 17 hospitals) evenly covering the whole of Finland were asked to fill in a questionnaire asking for data based on the 1993 medical records of a random sample of 50 diabetic patients from each center (total n = 3,800). HbAlc was used as an index of glycemic control. RESULTS: Information on 3,195 (84%) diabetic patients was received. HbAlc was measured in 67% of the patients in 1993. The mean HbAlc in the whole population was 8.6 +/- 1.9% (normal range 4-6%). Some 25% of patients had HbAlc < or = 7.3%, while 25% had HbAlc > or = 9.7%. The mean HbAlc was 8.8 +/- 1.9% in type 1 and 8.5 +/- 1.9% in type 2 diabetic patients. There was no sex difference in the HbAlc level in type 1 diabetic patients. However, male type 2 diabetic patients had better glycemic control than female patients (8.3 +/- 1.9 vs. 8.8 +/- 1.9%, P < 0.0001). The sex difference was independent of the type of therapy. The mean level of glycemic control was lowest among individuals with the shortest duration of diabetes. After 7-9 years after the diagnosis, there was no change in the mean level of glycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Average glycemic control is poor in a majority of the diabetic patients in Finland. Better treatment strategies and methods should be used to improve glycemic control and to reduce long-term complications.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of diabetes care at a national level in Finland, using level of glycemia as a determinant of success in treatment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Physicians and diabetes nurses in 76 randomly selected clinics (59 primary care units and 17 hospitals) evenly covering the whole of Finland were asked to fill in a questionnaire asking for data based on the 1993 medical records of a random sample of 50 diabeticpatients from each center (total n = 3,800). HbAlc was used as an index of glycemic control. RESULTS: Information on 3,195 (84%) diabeticpatients was received. HbAlc was measured in 67% of the patients in 1993. The mean HbAlc in the whole population was 8.6 +/- 1.9% (normal range 4-6%). Some 25% of patients had HbAlc < or = 7.3%, while 25% had HbAlc > or = 9.7%. The mean HbAlc was 8.8 +/- 1.9% in type 1 and 8.5 +/- 1.9% in type 2 diabeticpatients. There was no sex difference in the HbAlc level in type 1 diabeticpatients. However, male type 2 diabeticpatients had better glycemic control than female patients (8.3 +/- 1.9 vs. 8.8 +/- 1.9%, P < 0.0001). The sex difference was independent of the type of therapy. The mean level of glycemic control was lowest among individuals with the shortest duration of diabetes. After 7-9 years after the diagnosis, there was no change in the mean level of glycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Average glycemic control is poor in a majority of the diabeticpatients in Finland. Better treatment strategies and methods should be used to improve glycemic control and to reduce long-term complications.
Authors: Debra S Lotstein; Michael Seid; Georgeanna Klingensmith; Doug Case; Jean M Lawrence; Catherine Pihoker; Dana Dabelea; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Lisa K Gilliam; Sarah Corathers; Giuseppina Imperatore; Lawrence Dolan; Andrea Anderson; Ronny A Bell; Beth Waitzfelder Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jawad A Al-Lawati; Mohammed N Barakat; Ibrahim Al-Zakwani; Medhat K Elsayed; Masoud Al-Maskari; Nawar M Al-Lawati; Ali Jaffer Mohammed Journal: Open Cardiovasc Med J Date: 2012-11-02