Literature DB >> 10189482

Carotid arteries: maximizing arterial to venous contrast in fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced MR angiography with elliptic centric view ordering.

J Huston1, S B Fain, S J Riederer, A H Wilman, M A Bernstein, R F Busse.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To obtain high-spatial-resolution, venous-suppressed, contrast material-enhanced, three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) angiograms of the carotid arteries and aortic arch by using an elliptic centric view ordering with MR fluoroscopic triggering.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with cerebrovascular disease in the differential diagnosis were evaluated with fluoroscopically triggered 3D MR angiography (gadoteridol dose range, 0.1-0.3 mmol per kilogram of body weight; mean acquisition time, 40 second +/- 8 [SD]). The contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiograms were evaluated for overall quality, vascular signal intensity, venous suppression, and motion artifact. Twenty patients also underwent two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography. The overall quality of the 2D TOF MR angiograms and comparative quality between the 2D TOF and contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiograms were determined.
RESULTS: The contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiograms were of excellent or more than adequate quality for diagnosis in 36 of the 40 studies (90%). In 35 of the 38 contrast-enhanced 3D studies in which the contrast material bolus was detected fluoroscopically, the internal jugular vein signal intensity was either not detectable or barely visible. In 18 of the 20 patients who also underwent 2D TOF MR angiography, the quality of the contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiograms was graded as markedly superior or superior.
CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced, elliptic centric 3D MR angiography with real-time MR fluoroscopic triggering offers high-spatial-resolution images of the carotid arteries and aortic arch with reliable venous suppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10189482     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap08265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  17 in total

1.  MR angiography of spinal vascular disease: what about normal vessels?

Authors:  B C Bowen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography: the effects of k-space truncation on luminal representation in a carotid artery phantom model.

Authors:  E R Melhem; J M Serfaty; L Jones; R Itoh; B S Kuszyk; J B Martin; P Gailloud; K P Murphy; D A Rufenacht
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Time-resolved contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography using sensitivity encoding (SENSE).

Authors:  X Golay; S J Brown; R Itoh; E R Melhem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Luca Remonda; Pascal Senn; Alain Barth; Marcel Arnold; Karl-Olof Lövblad; Gerhard Schroth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Juan Alvarez-Linera; Julián Benito-León; José Escribano; Jorge Campollo; Ricardo Gesto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Improved venous suppression and spatial resolution with SENSE in elliptical centric 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  Houchun H Hu; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; David G Kruger; John Huston; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Suboptimal contrast opacification of dynamic head and neck MR angiography due to venous stasis and reflux: technical considerations for optimization.

Authors:  D R Hingwala; B Thomas; C Kesavadas; T R Kapilamoorthy
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Preangiographic evaluation of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas with elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR Angiography and effect on radiation dose and volume of iodinated contrast material.

Authors:  Patrick H Luetmer; John I Lane; Julie R Gilbertson; Matt A Bernstein; John Huston; John L D Atkinson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  Imaging the vertebral artery.

Authors:  Keng Yeow Tay; Jean Marie U-King-Im; Rikin A Trivedi; Nicholas J Higgins; Justin J Cross; John R Davies; Peter L Weissberg; Nagui M Antoun; Jonathan H Gillard
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Feathering: Vertebral artery pseudostenosis with elliptical centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  J Huston; M A Bernstein; S J Riederer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.