Non-invasive assessment of human baroreflex during different body positions.

Two techniques for evaluating human baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), i.e. the sequence technique and the cross-spectral technique, were compared during the following four different body positions; 6 degrees head-down tilt (HDT), supine (Sup), 60 degrees head-up tilt (HUT) and upright (Upr). The sequence technique is based on the slope of linear regression between beat-to-beat RR intervals and systolic blood pressures. The cross-spectral technique is based on the cross-spectral analysis of RR interval and systolic blood pressure variabilities, and the estimates of BRS were computed separately for the low-frequency region (0.04-0.15 Hz) and the high-frequency region (0.15-0.5 Hz). The BRS obtained by the sequence technique had a significant correlation to that obtained by the cross-spectral technique for the low-frequency region in HDT, Sup and HUT, but not in Upr. There was a significant correlation between the BRS obtained by the sequence technique and that obtained by the cross-spectral technique for the high-frequency region in every body position. It became clear that the sequence technique is mutually related to the cross-spectral technique for the high-frequency region, but not necessarily identical to the cross-spectral technique for the low-frequency region. Moreover, a comparison was also made between the baroreceptor activating sequence and the deactivating sequence in the sequence technique during the four different body positions. Although the estimates of BRS of the activating sequence and the deactivating sequence were similar in every body position, the numbers of their sequences were progressively separated in the order of HDT, Sup, HUT and Upr. The numbers of the activating sequence and the deactivating sequence in the sequence technique were found to be separated in a sympathetically dominant condition.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes