Literature DB >> 10186732

Principals and tools for evaluating community-based prevention and health promotion programs.

R M Goodman1.   

Abstract

This article is an overview and practical guide for the evaluation of community-based disease prevention and health promotion programs. The article first offers a rationale for evaluating community-based programs, then enumerates five selected principles that are contemporary to community evaluation. The principles are as follows: (1) evaluation of community programs should include an assessment of program theory; (2) evaluation instruments that are used to measure community programs must be contoured to each individual community; (3) evaluation approaches used should be guided by the questions asked and often require both a quantitative and qualitative orientation; (4) evaluation should be informed by social ecology and social system concepts; and (5) community evaluation should involve local stakeholders in meaningful ways. At the end of each principle, an annotated reference list is provided that contains tools for applying the principle to community evaluation.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10186732     DOI: 10.1097/00124784-199803000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract        ISSN: 1078-4659


  10 in total

Review 1.  Health promotion research: dilemmas and challenges.

Authors:  M A Koelen; L Vaandrager; C Colomér
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential.

Authors:  Cheryl Merzel; Joanna D'Afflitti
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Using mixed methods to measure the perception of community capacity in an academic-community partnership for a walking intervention.

Authors:  Charkarra Anderson-Lewis; Diana Cuy-Castellanos; Arnecca Byrd; Karen Zynda; Alicia Sample; Vickie Blakely Reed; Mary Beard; Latessa Minor; Kathleen Yadrick
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2011-09-30

4.  Process evaluation of a Dutch community intervention to improve health related behaviour in deprived neighbourhoods.

Authors:  Gittte C Kloek; Frank J van Lenthe; Yvonne M G Meertens; Maria A Koelen; Johan P Mackenbach
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2006

5.  A comprehensive model to evaluate implementation of the world health organization framework convention of tobacco control.

Authors:  Nizal Sarrafzadegan; Roya Kelishad; Katayoun Rabiei; Heidarali Abedi; Khadijeh Fereydoun Mohaseli; Hasan Azaripour Masooleh; Mousa Alavi; Gholamreza Heidari; Mostafa Ghaffari; Jennifer O'Loughlin
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2012-03

6.  Evaluation of stepping stones as a tool for changing knowledge, attitudes and behaviours associated with gender, relationships and HIV risk in Karnataka, India.

Authors:  Janet E Bradley; Parinita Bhattacharjee; Banadakoppa M Ramesh; Meghna Girish; Arup K Das
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Process evaluation of a community-based program for prevention and control of non-communicable disease in a developing country: The Isfahan Healthy Heart Program, Iran.

Authors:  Katayoun Rabiei; Roya Kelishadi; Nizal Sarrafzadegan; Heidar Ali Abedi; Mousa Alavi; Kamal Heidari; Ahmad Bahonar; Maryam Boshtam; Karim Zare; Shahryar Sadeghi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Identification of Complex Health Interventions Suitable for Evaluation: Development and Validation of the 8-Step Scoping Framework.

Authors:  Rosemary Davidson; Gurch Randhawa; Stephanie Cash
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2019-03-05

9.  Barriers to and Facilitators of the Evaluation of Integrated Community-Wide Overweight Intervention Approaches: A Qualitative Case Study in Two Dutch Municipalities.

Authors:  Tessa M van Koperen; Anja de Kruif; Lisa van Antwerpen; Anna-Marie Hendriks; Jacob C Seidell; Albertine J Schuit; Carry M Renders
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Formative research to reduce mine worker respirable silica dust exposure: a feasibility study to integrate technology into behavioral interventions.

Authors:  Emily Joy Haas; Dana Willmer; Andrew B Cecala
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2016-02-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.