Literature DB >> 10186680

Implementation issues and costs associated with a proven strategy for increasing breast and cervical cancer screening among low-income women.

P M Lantz1, D Stencil, M T Lippert, L Jaros, E D Eaker.   

Abstract

Results from a randomized controlled trial demonstrated that a physician reminder letter combined with telephone counseling from a health educator significantly increased women's use of both mammograms and Pap tests in a low-income population in a managed care setting. This article presents results from a process evaluation and cost analysis of the intervention. An average of 35 minutes was spent preparing each of 304 intervention letters for mailing, including the time needed to secure signatures from 110 physicians. The results of an economic analysis suggested that this intervention cost $11.44 per recipient and $28.93 per screening test received above expected. However, intervention costs can be reduced significantly if one physician signs all letters (rather than each woman's own primary care physician) and if the health educator labor costs are diminished (e.g., by using student interns). Overall, the women under study reported that they are comfortable with both mailed and telephone reminders when they are post due for a clinical preventive service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10186680     DOI: 10.1097/00124784-199600230-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract        ISSN: 1078-4659


  7 in total

1.  The Italian health surveillance (SiVeAS) prioritization approach to reduce chronic disease risk factors.

Authors:  Eduardo J Simoes; Sergio Mariotti; Alessandra Rossi; Alicia Heim; Felipe Lobello; Ali H Mokdad; Emanuele Scafato
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Revisiting the effect of the Pap test on cervical cancer.

Authors:  N D Holmquist
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  A randomized controlled trial to increase cancer screening among attendees of community health centers.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Lisa K Christman; Paul B Jacobsen; Alan B Cantor; Jennifer Schroeder; Rania Abdulla; Seft Hunter; Thomas N Chirikos; Jeffrey P Krischer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Improving colorectal cancer screening among the medically underserved: a pilot study within a federally qualified health center.

Authors:  Kishore Khankari; Mickey Eder; Chandra Y Osborn; Gregory Makoul; Marla Clayman; Silvia Skripkauskas; Linda Diamond-Shapiro; Dan Makundan; Michael S Wolf
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Thomas Everett; Andrew Bryant; Michelle F Griffin; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Carol A Forbes; Ruth G Jepson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-05-11

6.  Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Lee; Erik J Groessl; Theodore G Ganiats; Samuel B Ho
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 7.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Helen Staley; Aslam Shiraz; Norman Shreeve; Andrew Bryant; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Ketankumar Gajjar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.