Literature DB >> 10186463

The need for pharmacoeconomic evaluations in the NHS.

J P Griffin.   

Abstract

New medicines can be cost effective, and the under use of many therapeutic advances has been a cause for concern. Equally, the introduction of certain expensive products onto the market prematurely where adequate clinical studies have not been conducted equally represents an unsatisfactory situation. Many of these products that have reached the market 'too soon' have been for serious conditions where current treatments are inadequate and the new product represents a new hope which may or may not be realised. For some products, studies may have to take place after marketing and a condition for patients receiving treatment is that they are enrolled into a postmarketing study. Ultimately, decisions on the use of such treatments should be made after adequate clinical efficacy studies are available and independent pharmacoeconomic assessment has taken place. Decisions on the use of expensive treatments should be made nationally and not left to local health authorities desperate to balance their budgets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10186463     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199814030-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  29 in total

1.  A UK national prescribing list?

Authors:  T Walley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Too soon to market. Data available before products are launched are poor.

Authors:  W Clark; M Fisher; J Misson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-17

3.  Too soon to market. Statistical aspects of research done outside pharmaceutical industry could be improved.

Authors:  S Senn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-17

4.  Regulating the pharmaceutical industry. Authors seem to have misunderstood pharmaceutical price regulation scheme.

Authors:  P Read
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-17

5.  Too soon to market.

Authors:  T H Dent; S Hawke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-11-15

6.  Economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: what are reasonable standards for clinical evidence--the Australian experience.

Authors:  S Hill; D Henry; B Pekarsky; A Mitchell
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  New antiepileptic drugs: a systematic review of their efficacy and tolerability.

Authors:  A G Marson; Z A Kadir; D W Chadwick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-09

8.  Long-term use of lamotrigine and vigabatrin in severe refractory epilepsy: audit of outcome.

Authors:  M C Walker; L M Li; J W Sander
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-09

9.  Newly licensed drugs.

Authors:  R E Ferner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-09

10.  Regulating the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  A Maynard; K Bloor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.