Literature DB >> 10185514

QALYs versus HYEs--what's right and what's wrong. A review of the controversy.

W Ried1.   

Abstract

The paper uses an axiomatic approach to the description of individual preferences for health status sequences to resolve the major issues at state in the recent controversy over QALYs versus HYEs. While the HYE accounts for an individual's time preference for health, QALY scores based on the time trade-off method will generally differ from the number of HYEs. HYEs do not represent preferences for health under risk unless the utility function for reference flows of health is linear. Collapsing the two-step HYE assessment procedure into a single step entails a loss of information as regards the utility of a health status sequence. Although the procedure does represent preferences for health, it fails to supply a description in terms of HYEs in the case of risk. As a remedy, a modified HYE approach is proposed.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10185514     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6296(97)00037-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  2 in total

Review 1.  AIDS policy modeling for the 21st century: an overview of key issues.

Authors:  M S Rauner; M L Brandeau
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2001-09

2.  The Cost of Uncertain Life Span.

Authors:  Ryan D Edwards
Journal:  J Popul Econ       Date:  2008-06-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.