Literature DB >> 10183288

How consumers/survivors are evaluating the quality of psychiatric care.

J Campbell1.   

Abstract

In the past decade, mental health consumers have increasingly become involved in evaluating the quality of psychiatric care and applying sophisticated data strategies to affect system reform. Through multistakeholder partnerships, they have identified outcome indicators, collaborated in the development of a mental health report card, and designed and conducted consumer self report surveys on satisfaction and needs and preferences for housing and supports. The formation of multistakeholder assessment teams; the definition of the consumer perspective through focus groups and concept-mapping pilots; and research on coercion, personhood, recovery, and empowerment are key activities of consumers/survivors in the field of evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10183288     DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9702100310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Rev        ISSN: 0193-841X


  2 in total

Review 1.  Acceptability of compulsory powers in the community: the ethical considerations of mental health service users on Supervised Discharge and Guardianship.

Authors:  K Canvin; A Bartlett; V Pinfold
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Developing a realist theory of psychosocial rehabilitation: the Clubhouse model.

Authors:  Christina Mutschler; Jen Rouse; Kelly McShane; Criss Habal-Brosek
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.