Literature DB >> 10182811

Trends and differential use of assistive technology devices: United States, 1994.

J N Russell1, G E Hendershot, F LeClere, L J Howie, M Adler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This report presents data on annual estimates of the prevalence of use of selected assistive technology devices for vision, hearing, mobility, and orthopedic impairments, including missing limbs. Also presented are statistics on trends in the prevalence of use of selected mobility assistive technology devices for the years 1980, 1990, and 1994.
METHODS: The data used for this report are from the 1994 National Health Interview Survey on Disability (NHIS-D), Phase I, which was co-sponsored by a consortium of U.S. Federal agencies and private foundations. All estimates are based on data from the NHIS-D, Phase I, which represent the civilian, noninstitutional population of the United States.
RESULTS: An estimated 7.4 million persons in the U.S. household population used assistive technology devices for mobility impairments, 4.6 million for orthopedic impairments (including missing limbs), 4.5 million for hearing impairments (not including impairments fully compensated by hearing aids), and 0.5 million for vision impairments. Use of any mobility device for all ages had the highest prevalence rate at 28.5 per 1,000 persons. There was a positive correlation between an increase in age and the increase in the prevalence rate of device usage; for example, of persons in the age group 65 years and over, the rate of mobility, hearing, and vision device usage was more than 4 times the rate for the total population.
CONCLUSION: Assistive technology use has increased because of population size, age composition changes, and a change in the rate of use. Medical and technological advances along with public policy initiatives have also contributed to increased usage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10182811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Data        ISSN: 0147-3956


  7 in total

1.  Wheelchair users at home: few home modifications and many injurious falls.

Authors:  Katherine Berg; Marilyn Hines; Susan Allen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Perspectives on the recent decline in disability at older ages.

Authors:  Douglas A Wolf; Kelly Hunt; James Knickman
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Why is late-life disability declining?

Authors:  Robert F Schoeni; Vicki A Freedman; Linda G Martin
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Comparison of Rectified and Unrectified Sockets for Transtibial Amputees.

Authors:  Jack R Engsberg; S Wayne Sprouse; Mary L Uhrich; Barbara R Ziegler; F Daniel Luitjohan
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2008

Review 5.  The potential for technology to enhance independence for those aging with a disability.

Authors:  Emily M Agree
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 2.554

6.  The 1994-1995 National Health Interview Survey on Disability (NHIS-D): A Bibliography of 20 Years of Research.

Authors:  Brian W Ward; Heather Ridolfo; Lauren Creamer; Caroline Gray
Journal:  Rev Disabil Stud       Date:  2015

7.  Respondent driven sampling of wheelchair users: A lack of traction?

Authors:  John A Bourke; Philip J Schluter; E Jean C Hay-Smith; Deborah L Snell
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-04-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.