Literature DB >> 10182115

The efficacy and safety of a pharmacologic protocol for maintaining coronary artery bypass patients at a higher mean arterial pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass.

P A Pirraglia1, J C Peterson, G S Hartman, F S Yao, S J Thomas, M E Charlson.   

Abstract

A recent randomized trial of higher versus lower mean arterial pressure (MAP) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) showed that higher MAP on CPB was associated with a lower incidence of overall cardiac and neurologic morbidity and mortality in coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) patients. Cardiopulmonary bypass MAP was controlled pharmacologically while CPB flow was held constant for any given period. The objective of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of this pharmacologic protocol. Two hundred forty-eight patients participated in the study; the mean age was 65.8 +/- 9.4 years, 20% were women, and the mean preoperative ejection fraction was 48%. The low-flow corrected CPB MAP attained for the low and high MAP groups was 56.7 +/- 5.0 mmHg and 77.7 +/- 7.1 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.0001). Major cardiac and neurologic outcomes, postoperative blood loss, renal dysfunction, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and duration of intubation were not found to be significantly associated with any drug in the pharmacologic protocol. These findings support that the pharmacologic protocol used to maintain CABG patients at higher MAP on CPB is both efficacious and safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10182115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  3 in total

1.  Mean arterial blood pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Jeffery B Riley
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2013-09

2.  Difference between pre-operative and cardiopulmonary bypass mean arterial pressure is independently associated with early cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Hussein D Kanji; Costas J Schulze; Marilou Hervas-Malo; Peter Wang; David B Ross; Mohamad Zibdawi; Sean M Bagshaw
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 1.637

3.  Attrition in longitudinal randomized controlled trials: home visits make a difference.

Authors:  Janey C Peterson; Paul A Pirraglia; Martin T Wells; Mary E Charlson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.