Literature DB >> 10181801

The balanced scorecard: a potent tool for energizing and focusing healthcare organization management.

C W Chow1, D Ganulin, O Teknika, K Haddad, J Williamson.   

Abstract

The current environment for healthcare organizations contains many forces demanding unprecedented levels of change. These forces include changing demographics, increased customer expectations, increased competition, and intensified governmental pressure. Meeting these challenges will require healthcare organizations to undergo fundamental changes and to continuously seek new ways to create future value. This article provides explanation of a potent new management tool-the balanced scorecard-that can be used by healthcare organizations to meet these challenges. The article also presents the opinions of many high-level healthcare administrators that the balanced scorecard can be highly beneficial to healthcare organizations. It also summarizes these administrators' suggestions regarding the goals and measures that can make up an effective scorecard for a hospital as a whole, as well as for a specific subunit of a hospital. Interestingly, while no published report of balanced scorecard implementations in healthcare organizations exists, a number of administrators stated that they had fully implemented systems similar to the scorecard. These actions can be considered support for the scorecard's potential usefulness; at the same time, they suggest that some sharing of experiences will likely be available in the future. As all administrators are well aware, moving from concept to practice is often difficult. While the article includes some suggestions for scorecard development and implementation, each organization must engage in the full range of activities, from defining its mission to the selection of goals and strategies, and develop its own unique scorecard to assist progress toward the selected goals. As a starting point, Table 3 provides a timeline of some general events that may be common to all organizations during this process.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10181801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Manag        ISSN: 1096-9012


  8 in total

Review 1.  [The balanced scorecard. "Tool or toy" in hospitals].

Authors:  A Brinkmann; F Gebhard; R Isenmann; U Bothner; U Mohl; B Schwilk
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  A balanced scorecard approach in assessing IT value in healthcare sector: an empirical examination.

Authors:  Ing-Long Wu; Yi-Zu Kuo
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  How to juggle priorities? An interactive tool to provide quantitative support for strategic patient-mix decisions: an ophthalmology case.

Authors:  Paul E Joustra; Jesse de Wit; Nico M Van Dijk; Piet J M Bakker
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2011-06-04

4.  Performance evaluation of medical service for breast cancer patients based on diagnosis related groups.

Authors:  Xinkui Liu; Furong Liu; Lin Wang; MengFan Wu; LinPeng Yang; Le Wei
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Balanced performance measurement in research hospitals: the participative case study of a haematology department.

Authors:  Simona Catuogno; Claudia Arena; Sara Saggese; Fabrizia Sarto
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  The DEMATEL method explores the interdependent relationship structure and weights for diagnosis-related groups system.

Authors:  Tong Zou; Yanjun Jin; Yen-Ching Chuang; Ching-Wen Chien; Tao-Hsin Tung
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-04

7.  Traditional vs. Contemporary Management Control Practices for Developing Public Health Policies.

Authors:  David Naranjo-Gil; María Jesús Sánchez-Expósito; Laura Gómez-Ruiz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  [Usefulness of the budget and the balanced scorecard in managing Primary Care Centres. Impact on staff motivation].

Authors:  Juan Manuel Ramón-Jerónimo; Raquel Flórez-López; Natalia Domínguez-Lario
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 1.137

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.