Literature DB >> 10180841

Measurement of overall and disease-specific health status: does the order of questionnaires make a difference?

M J Barry1, E Walker-Corkery, Y Chang, L T Tyll, D C Cherkin, F J Fowler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to detect any effect of order when modules on disease-specific and overall health status are combined in an outcomes research questionnaire.
METHODS: Men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were prospectively enrolled in a clinical trial of an educational intervention in Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, a prepaid group practice. Within the trial, 392 consecutive men were randomized to one of two versions of a baseline questionnaire. One had a 38-item module on BPH-specific health status first, followed by a 30-item module on overall health status; the other had the modules in reverse order. Scores were compared for three BPH-specific scales and eight scales measuring overall health. Data were collected in the form of self-administered questionnaires.
RESULTS: Comparing the groups assigned the two versions of the questionnaire, no significant differences in scores on any of the health status scales were found.
CONCLUSIONS: In this dataset, we could find no evidence of an order effect when modules on BPH-specific and overall health status were combined in different sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10180841     DOI: 10.1177/135581969600100105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  6 in total

1.  The validity and reliability of scales for the evaluation of end-of-life care in advanced dementia.

Authors:  Dan K Kiely; Ladislav Volicer; Joan Teno; Richard N Jones; Holly G Prigerson; Susan L Mitchell
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.703

2.  Effect of order of administration of health-related quality of life interview instruments on responses.

Authors:  Ashley L Childs
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Effects of patient-reported outcome assessment order.

Authors:  Paul J Novotny; Amylou C Dueck; Daniel Satele; Marlene H Frost; Timothy J Beebe; Kathleen J Yost; Minji K Lee; David T Eton; Susan Yount; David Cella; Tito R Mendoza; Charles S Cleeland; Victoria Blinder; Ethan Basch; Jeff A Sloan
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.599

4.  Question context and priming meaning of health: effect on differences in self-rated health between Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites.

Authors:  Sunghee Lee; Norbert Schwarz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.

Authors:  Valerie C Brueton; Jayne Tierney; Sally Stenning; Seeromanie Harding; Sarah Meredith; Irwin Nazareth; Greta Rait
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-03

6.  Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.

Authors:  Katie Gillies; Anna Kearney; Ciara Keenan; Shaun Treweek; Jemma Hudson; Valerie C Brueton; Thomas Conway; Andrew Hunter; Louise Murphy; Peter J Carr; Greta Rait; Paul Manson; Magaly Aceves-Martins
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.