Literature DB >> 10180342

Preferences for health outcomes and cost-utility analysis.

G W Torrance1.   

Abstract

Economic evaluation of health programs consists of the comparative analysis of alternative courses of action in terms of both costs and consequences. The five analytic techniques are cost-consequence analysis, cost-minimization analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis, and cost-benefit analysis. Although all techniques have the same objective of informing decision making in the health programs, they come from different theoretic backgrounds and relate differently to the discipline of economics. Cost-utility analysis formally incorporates the measured preferences of individuals for the health outcome consequences of the alternative programs. The individuals may be actual patients who are experiencing or have experienced the outcomes, or they may be a representative sample of the community, many of whom may someday face the outcomes. The health outcomes, at the most general level, consist of changes in the quantity and quality of life; that is, changes in mortality and morbidity. Changes in quantity of life are measured with mortality; changes in quality of life are measured with health-related quality-of-life instruments. Utilities represent a particular approach to the measurement of health-related quality of life that is founded on a well specified theory and provides an interval scale metric. Changes in quantity of life, as measured in years, can be combined with changes in quality of life, as measured in utilities, to determine the number of quality-adjusted life years gained by a particular health program. This can be compared with the incremental cost of the program to determine the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Utilities may be measured directly on patients or other respondents by means of techniques such as visual analog scaling, standard gamble, or time trade-off. Utilities may be determined indirectly by means of a preference-weighted multi-attribute health status classification system such as the health utilities index. The health utilities index is actually a complete system for use in studies. It consists of questionnaires in various formats and languages, scoring manuals, and descriptive health status classification systems. The health utilities index is useful in clinical studies and in population health surveys, as well as in cost-utility analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10180342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  31 in total

1.  Measuring preferences for cost-utility analysis: how choice of method may influence decision-making.

Authors:  Christine M McDonough; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Reliability, validity, and minimally important differences of the SF-6D in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Daniel E Furst; Weng Kee Wong; Joel Tsevat; Philip J Clements; Grace S Park; Arnold E Postlethwaite; Mansoor Ahmed; Shaari Ginsburg; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Design and rationale of health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes assessment in the Frequent Hemodialysis Network trials.

Authors:  Manisha Jhamb; Manjula K Tamura; Jennifer Gassman; Amit X Garg; Robert M Lindsay; Rita S Suri; George Ting; Fredric O Finkelstein; Scott Beach; Paul L Kimmel; Mark Unruh
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 2.614

4.  The cost-utility of lumbar disc herniation surgery.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hansson; Tommy Hansson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Differences in EQ-5D-3L health state valuations among patients with musculoskeletal diseases, health care professionals and healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Anja Schwalm; You-Shan Feng; Jörn Moock; Thomas Kohlmann
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-10-05

6.  Breast Cancer in Young Women: Health State Utility Impacts by Race/Ethnicity.

Authors:  Justin G Trogdon; Donatus U Ekwueme; Linda Chamiec-Case; Gery P Guy
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Reconstructing the rheumatoid wrist: a utility analysis comparing total wrist fusion and total wrist arthroplasty from the perspectives of rheumatologists and hand surgeons.

Authors:  Christi M Cavaliere; Adam J Oppenheimer; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2009-04-28

8.  Influence of a symptom management telehealth intervention on older adults' early recovery outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Susan Barnason; Lani Zimmerman; Janet Nieveen; Paula Schulz; Connie Miller; Melody Hertzog; Chunhao Tu
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.210

9.  Treatment of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  Jae W Song; Kevin C Chung; Lisa A Prosser
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Assessment of children's own health status using visual analogue scale and descriptive system of the EQ-5D-Y: linkage between two systems.

Authors:  X Y Wu; A Ohinmaa; J A Johnson; P J Veugelers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.