Literature DB >> 10178644

Measurement of short term health effects in economic evaluations.

A M Holmes1.   

Abstract

Short term health effects can significantly impact health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Appropriate healthcare priorities can be set only if they are based on health status measurements which are consistent with how people value both short and long term health effects. This article discusses methods by which such health effects may be measured using health state utilities. The standard discounted quality-adjusted life-year model, in which the values of the various health states are weighted by the time spent in each state, generally fails to capture the true impact of temporary ill health on HR-QOL. Instead, a scenario approach is recommended in which valuations are based on holistic descriptions of health states which include all short and long term health effects experienced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10178644     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199813020-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  19 in total

1.  The myth of the HYE (healthy year equivalent)

Authors:  G Loomes
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  The measurement of utility in multiphase health states.

Authors:  J Richardson; J Hall; G Salkeld
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 3.  Outcome measurement in economic evaluation.

Authors:  M Johannesson; B Jönsson; G Karlsson
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Proportional heuristics in time tradeoff and conjoint measurement.

Authors:  P F Stalmeier; T G Bezembinder; I J Unic
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1996 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  The validity of QALYs: an experimental test of constant proportional tradeoff and utility independence.

Authors:  H Bleichrodt; M Johannesson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1997 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Quality-adjusted life years, utility theory, and healthy-years equivalents.

Authors:  A Mehrez; A Gafni
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1989 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 7.  Time preference for health in cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  J Lipscomb
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Time in health: can we measure individuals' "pure time preferences"?

Authors:  A Gafni
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Measuring utility values for QALYs: two methodological issues.

Authors:  R Smith; M Dobson
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  The standard gamble method: what is being measured and how it is interpreted.

Authors:  A Gafni
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  1 in total

1.  Estimating the costs and benefits of screening monogamous, heterosexual couples for unrecognised infection with herpes simplex virus type 2.

Authors:  D N Fisman; E W Hook; S J Goldie
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.519

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.