Literature DB >> 10178496

Identifying diabetes mellitus or heart disease among health maintenance organization members: sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and cost of survey and database methods.

P J O'Connor1, W A Rush, N P Pronk, L M Cherney.   

Abstract

We conducted a study of the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and cost of two methods of identifying diagnosed diabetes mellitus or heart disease among members of a health maintenance organization (HMO). Among 3186 adult HMO members who were attending one primary care clinic, 2326 were reached for a telephone survey (efficiency = 0.73). Among these members, 1991 answered standardized questions to ascertain whether they had diabetes or heart disease (corrected response rate = 0.85). Linkage was then made to computerized diagnostic databases. By means of both a database method and a survey method, the 1976 members with complete data for analysis were classified as having or not having diabetes or heart disease. When results with the two methods disagreed, charts were reviewed to confirm the presence or absence of diabetes or heart disease. Diabetes was identified among 4.7% of adult members, and heart disease was identified among 3.7%. Identification of diabetes differed between the database method and the survey method (sensitivity 0.91 vs 0.98, specificity 0.99 vs 0.99, positive predictive value 0.94 vs 0.83). Identification of heart attach history was similar for the database method and the survey method (sensitivity 0.89 vs 0.95, specificity 0.99 vs 0.99, positive predictive value 0.79 vs 0.81). The cost of obtaining data was $13.50 per member for the survey method and $0.30 per member for the database method. Database methods or survey methods of identifying selected chronic diseases among HMO members may be acceptable for various purposes, but database identification methods appear to be less expensive and provide information on a higher proportion of HMO members than do survey methods. Accurate identification of chronic diseases among patients supports clinic-level measures for clinical improvement, research, and accountability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10178496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  43 in total

1.  Simulated physician learning intervention to improve safety and quality of diabetes care: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Patrick J O'Connor; Joann M Sperl-Hillen; Paul E Johnson; William A Rush; Stephen E Asche; Pradyumina Dutta; George R Biltz
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  A dynamic Markov model for forecasting diabetes prevalence in the United States through 2050.

Authors:  Amanda A Honeycutt; James P Boyle; Kristine R Broglio; Theodore J Thompson; Thomas J Hoerger; Linda S Geiss; K M Venkat Narayan
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2003-08

3.  Testing electronic algorithms to create disease registries in a safety net system.

Authors:  Rebecca Hanratty; Raymond O Estacio; L Miriam Dickinson; Vijayalaxmi Chandramouli; John F Steiner; Edward P Havranek
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2008-05

4.  Impact of an electronic medical record on diabetes quality of care.

Authors:  Patrick J O'Connor; A Lauren Crain; William A Rush; Joann M Sperl-Hillen; Jay J Gutenkauf; Jane E Duncan
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  The Burden of Obesity on Diabetes in the United States: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2008 to 2012.

Authors:  Man Yee Mallory Leung; Nils P Carlsson; Graham A Colditz; Su-Hsin Chang
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  Medicare Star excludes diabetes patients with poor CVD risk factor control.

Authors:  Julie Schmittdiel; Marsha Raebel; Wendy Dyer; John Steiner; Glenn Goodrich; Andy Karter; Gregory Nichols
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Validation of an algorithm for identifying type 1 diabetes in adults based on electronic health record data.

Authors:  Emily B Schroeder; William T Donahoo; Glenn K Goodrich; Marsha A Raebel
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Sirolimus is associated with new-onset diabetes in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Olwyn Johnston; Caren L Rose; Angela C Webster; John S Gill
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Diabetic patients who smoke: are they different?

Authors:  Leif I Solberg; Jay R Desai; Patrick J O'Connor; Donald B Bishop; Heather M Devlin
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Customized feedback to patients and providers failed to improve safety or quality of diabetes care: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Patrick J O'Connor; JoAnn Sperl-Hillen; Paul E Johnson; William A Rush; A Lauren Crain
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 17.152

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.