Literature DB >> 10174798

Strategy under uncertainty.

H Courtney1, J Kirkland, P Viguerie.   

Abstract

At the heart of the traditional approach to strategy lies the assumption that by applying a set of powerful analytic tools, executives can predict the future of any business accurately enough to allow them to choose a clear strategic direction. But what happens when the environment is so uncertain that no amount of analysis will allow us to predict the future? What makes for a good strategy in highly uncertain business environments? The authors, consultants at McKinsey & Company, argue that uncertainty requires a new way of thinking about strategy. All too often, they say, executives take a binary view: either they underestimate uncertainty to come up with the forecasts required by their companies' planning or capital-budging processes, or they overestimate it, abandon all analysis, and go with their gut instinct. The authors outline a new approach that begins by making a crucial distinction among four discrete levels of uncertainty that any company might face. They then explain how a set of generic strategies--shaping the market, adapting to it, or reserving the right to play at a later time--can be used in each of the four levels. And they illustrate how these strategies can be implemented through a combination of three basic types of actions: big bets, options, and no-regrets moves. The framework can help managers determine which analytic tools can inform decision making under uncertainty--and which cannot. At a broader level, it offers executives a discipline for thinking rigorously and systematically about uncertainty and its implications for strategy.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10174798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Harv Bus Rev        ISSN: 0017-8012


  7 in total

1.  Newsvendor problem under complete uncertainty: a case of innovative products.

Authors:  Helena Gaspars-Wieloch
Journal:  Cent Eur J Oper Res       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  COVID-19 and Alternative Conceptualisations of Value and Risk in GPN Research.

Authors:  John R Bryson; Vida Vanchan
Journal:  Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr       Date:  2020-06-19

3.  Resilience in the Surgical Scheduling to Support Adaptive Scheduling System.

Authors:  Lisa Wiyartanti; Choon Hak Lim; Myon Woong Park; Jae Kwan Kim; Gyu Hyun Kwon; Laehyun Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  The feasibility study of investment in public hospital construction project using the real options model.

Authors:  Hasan Hematyar; Ali Akbari Sari; Davoud Danesh Jafari; Abolghasem Pourreza
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2019-10-24

5.  Multinational enterprises and natural disasters: Challenges and opportunities for IB research.

Authors:  Chang Hoon Oh; Jennifer Oetzel
Journal:  J Int Bus Stud       Date:  2022-01-08

6.  Overcoming the COVID-19 Crisis and Planning for the Future.

Authors:  Steven H LoGiudice; Allison Liebhaber; Heiko Schöder
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  The Desirable Systemic Uncertainty in Complex IoT Sensor Networks-General Anticipatory Foresight Perspective.

Authors:  Andrzej Magruk
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.