Literature DB >> 10174535

Determining priorities for purchasers. The public response to rationing within the NHS.

A Richardson.   

Abstract

There is currently great interest in how best to consult the public on purchasing priorities, but little information about the results of such activity. Based on health panels set up by Somerset Health Authority, intends to rectify this gap. The public were found to strongly favour universality of treatment, regardless of the cause of a condition, the age of the patient or the cost, although people should take some responsibility for their own health. There is a reluctance to purchase treatment for people who are not ill, although resources are well spent on health promotion and advice services. Argues that ordinary members of the public are capable of exploring complex funding priorities. A qualitative approach is essential to provide time for reflection, as the process of deliberation affects the decisions reached.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10174535     DOI: 10.1108/02689239710177332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Med        ISSN: 0268-9235


  4 in total

1.  Public involvement in health care priority setting: an overview of methods for eliciting values.

Authors:  Penelope M. Mullen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Editorial.

Authors:  Angela Coulter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Age as a criterion for setting priorities in health care? A survey of the German public view.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Jeannette Winkelhage; Norman Wirsik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Who Shall Not Be Treated: Public Attitudes on Setting Health Care Priorities by Person-Based Criteria in 28 Nations.

Authors:  Jana Rogge; Bernhard Kittel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.