Literature DB >> 10168751

Health technology assessment: decentralized and fragmented in the US compared to other countries.

S Perry1, M Thamer.   

Abstract

This paper presents the results of the first comprehensive international survey to catalogue health technology assessment (HTA) activities. By 1995, there were formal HTA programs in 24 countries established mostly in the late 1980s and early 1990s. European countries generally have one or two federal or provincial HTA programs each, Canada has an extensive network of federal and regional organizations coordinated by a central body and the US has 53 HTA organizations, the vast majority of which are in the private sector. While the commitment of the US government to HTA has been erratic, the private sector has been witness to an expansion of HTA activities by insurance companies, hospitals, medical/device manufacturers, consulting firms and health professional societies. In contrast to other developed countries, the current state of technology assessment in the US is decentralized, fragmented and duplicative. We conclude by discussing the importance of a US HTA agency at the national level.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10168751     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(97)00897-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  5 in total

1.  Health technology assessment in Canada and the United States: the case of biologics.

Authors:  J Scott Haas; Eric J Moskowitz
Journal:  Biotechnol Healthc       Date:  2007-04

Review 2.  [Health technology assessment (HTA). Developments in healthcare and potential for radiology].

Authors:  E R Gizewski; M Forsting; G A Krombach; O Schöffski
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Technological innovation and its effect on public health in the United States.

Authors:  Preetinder Singh Gill
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2013-01-23

4.  Evidence-informed health policy 2 - survey of organizations that support the use of research evidence.

Authors:  John N Lavis; Elizabeth J Paulsen; Andrew D Oxman; Ray Moynihan
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Evidence-informed health policy 3 - interviews with the directors of organizations that support the use of research evidence.

Authors:  John N Lavis; Andrew D Oxman; Ray Moynihan; Elizabeth J Paulsen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 7.327

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.