Literature DB >> 10168261

Related effectiveness of continued, lapsed, and delayed smoking prevention intervention in senior high school students.

L Eckhardt1, S I Woodruff, J P Elder.   

Abstract

The relative effectiveness of continued, lapsed, and delayed smoking prevention intervention was tested with senior high school students. The original intervention was conducted during Grades 7 through 9, with significantly fewer intervention students reporting smoking than control students. The intervention was reintroduced in the 11th grade to one-half of intervention students (continued intervention), was withdrawn from the other half (lapsed intervention), and was initiated with one-half control students (delayed intervention). The 11th-grade smoking rates of these groups were compared to those of a fourth group, a continued control group. Results showed that continued control students reported significantly less smoking than continued control students and lapsed intervention students. Additionally, the delayed intervention group exhibited smoking rates lower than the lapsed intervention and continued control groups. This finding underscores the importance of continuing smoking prevention activities, as well as initiating these activities, in senior high school years.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10168261     DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-11.6.418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  8 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of comprehensive tobacco control programmes in reducing teenage smoking in the USA.

Authors:  M Wakefield; F Chaloupka
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Smoke-free cafe in an unregulated European city: highly welcomed and economically successful.

Authors:  N Künzli; P Mazzoletti; M Adam; T Götschi; P Mathys; C Monn; O Brändli
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Evaluation of California's in-school tobacco use prevention education (TUPE) activities using a nested school-longitudinal design, 2003-2004 and 2005-2006.

Authors:  Hye-Youn Park; Clyde Dent; Erin Abramsohn; Barbara Dietsch; William J McCarthy
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  School-based programmes for preventing smoking.

Authors:  Roger E Thomas; Julie McLellan; Rafael Perera
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-04-30

Review 5.  Adolescent and young adult tobacco prevention and cessation: current status and future directions.

Authors:  C L Backinger; P Fagan; E Matthews; R Grana
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Promoting life skills and preventing tobacco use among low-income Mumbai youth: effects of Salaam Bombay Foundation intervention.

Authors:  Glorian Sorensen; Prakash C Gupta; Eve Nagler; Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Peer-led interventions to prevent tobacco, alcohol and/or drug use among young people aged 11-21 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  MacArthur Georgie J; Harrison Sean; Caldwell Deborah M; Hickman Matthew; Campbell Rona
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  School-based smoking prevention programs with the promise of long-term effects.

Authors:  Brian R Flay
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.600

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.