Literature DB >> 10166053

Assessing community values in health care: is the 'willingness to pay' method feasible?

C Donaldson1, S Farrar, T Mapp, A Walker, S Macphee.   

Abstract

In this paper an economics approach to assessing community values in health care priority setting is examined. The approach is based on the concept of 'willingness to pay' (WTP). Eighty two parents were interviewed with regard to three aspects of provision of child health services. For each aspect a choice of two courses of action was presented. Parents were asked which course of action they preferred and what was the maximum amount of money they would be prepared to pay for this rather than their less preferred option. WTP responses are acceptable to the majority of respondents and appear to 'behave' in accordance with a priori expectations. A method of assessing the influence of ability to pay on preferences and WTP is outlined. Preferences and WTP do not appear to have been unduly distorted by ability to pay. Use of WTP data does have the potential to provide health care purchasers and providers with information on intensity as well as direction of the preferences of members of the community.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10166053     DOI: 10.1007/BF02678452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  11 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal.

Authors:  G W Torrance
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Economic evaluation of lipid lowering--a feasibility test of the contingent valuation approach.

Authors:  M Johannesson
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Willingness-to-pay as a measure of benefits. Relevant questions in the context of public decisionmaking about health care programs.

Authors:  A Gafni
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Stepwise or couple antenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis?: women's preferences and willingness to pay.

Authors:  Z Miedzybrodzka; J Semper; P Shackley; M Abdalla; C Donaldson
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Willingness to pay for antenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  C Donaldson; P Shackley; M Abdalla; Z Miedzybrodzka
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Explorations in consultation of the public and health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district.

Authors:  A Bowling; B Jacobson; L Southgate
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Willingness to pay for publicly-provided goods. A possible measure of benefit?

Authors:  C Donaldson
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  The willingness to pay for in vitro fertilization: a pilot study using contingent valuation.

Authors:  P J Neumann; M Johannesson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  What do patients value? Willingness to pay for ultrasound in normal pregnancy.

Authors:  D M Berwick; M C Weinstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Cost-benefit analysis of non-pharmacological treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  M Johannesson; H Aberg; L Agréus; L Borgquist; B Jönsson
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 8.989

View more
  17 in total

1.  Public involvement in health care priority setting: an overview of methods for eliciting values.

Authors:  Penelope M. Mullen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Recent advances in the methods of cost-benefit analysis in healthcare. Matching the art to the science.

Authors:  E McIntosh; C Donaldson; M Ryan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Creativity and sacrifice: two sides of the coin. A reply to David Seedhouse.

Authors:  S Farrar; C Donaldson; S Macphee; A Walker; T Mapp
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1997-12

Review 4.  The (near) equivalence of cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses. Fact or fallacy?

Authors:  C Donaldson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  The inescapable prejudice of health economics: a reply to Farrar, Donaldson, Macphee, Walker and Mapp.

Authors:  D Seedhouse
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1997-12

Review 6.  Eliciting reasons: empirical methods in priority setting.

Authors:  Andreas Hasman
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-03

7.  Tautology and value: the flawed foundations of health economics.

Authors:  D Seedhouse
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1997-03

8.  Consumer willingness to invest money and time for benefits of lifestyle behaviour change: an application of the contingent valuation method.

Authors:  Adrienne F G Alayli-Goebbels; Job van Exel; André J H A Ament; Nanne K de Vries; Sandra D M Bot; Johan L Severens
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Building Efficient Crime Prevention Strategies: Considering the Economics of Investing in Human Development.

Authors:  D Max Crowley
Journal:  Criminol Public Policy       Date:  2013-05

10.  Willingness to pay for rapid diagnostic tests for the diagnosis and treatment of malaria in southeast Nigeria: ex post and ex ante.

Authors:  Benjamin Sc Uzochukwu; Obinna E Onwujekwe; Nkoli P Uguru; Maduka D Ughasoro; Ogochukwu P Ezeoke
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2010-01-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.