Literature DB >> 10165958

Attitudes toward age-based health care rationing. A qualitative assessment.

L B Kuder1, P W Roeder.   

Abstract

This study is designed to contribute to recent efforts to assess public views on age-based rationing of health care by reporting findings from a qualitative research project using focus group interviews. Group interviews find that respondents are concerned about the high costs of health care, but few attribute these costs to overuse by older people. Respondents reject the notion of specific policies limiting health care based on the age of the patient. Respondents of all ages tend to reject the idea of paying for treatment to extend the life of the hopelessly ill when all beneficial treatment efforts have been attempted. Although expressing strong feelings about equality of opportunity for health care, respondents are ambivalent about the role that government should play to accomplish this goal. Differences in attitudes toward allocation of health care appear to be associated more with differences in socioeconomic status and political orientation than with differences in age of respondents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 10165958     DOI: 10.1177/089826439500700207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aging Health        ISSN: 0898-2643


  6 in total

1.  The relevance of personal characteristics in allocating health care resources-controversial preferences of laypersons with different educational backgrounds.

Authors:  Jeannette Winkelhage; Adele Diederich
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Age as a criterion for setting priorities in health care? A survey of the German public view.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Jeannette Winkelhage; Norman Wirsik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Citizen participation in patient prioritization policy decisions: an empirical and experimental study on patients' characteristics.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Joffre Swait; Norman Wirsik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Public engagement in setting healthcare priorities: a ranking exercise in Cyprus.

Authors:  Antonis Farmakas; Mamas Theodorou; Petros Galanis; Georgios Karayiannis; Stefanos Ghobrial; Nikos Polyzos; Evridiki Papastavrou; Eirini Agapidaki; Kyriakos Souliotis
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2017-08-09

Review 5.  The sociology of rationing: Towards increased interdisciplinary dialogue - A critical interpretive literature review.

Authors:  Amalie Martinus Hauge; Eva Iris Otto; Sarah Wadmann
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2022-06-12

6.  Prioritising health service innovation investments using public preferences: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Seda Erdem; Carl Thompson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.