Literature DB >> 10164057

A case for the adoption of pharmacoeconomic guidelines in Japan.

S Ikeda1, N Ikegami, A J Oliver, M Ikeda.   

Abstract

In recent years, more and more Japanese pharmaceutical companies have been submitting pharmacoeconomic data to the government, following the official request that such data may help in setting pharmaceutical prices. The companies have cooperated because, by doing so, they could influence pricing decisions for new products. However, the quality of these data at present is considered to be poor and heavily biased. The introduction of pharmacoeconomic guidelines that outline a set of standardised factors to be included in evaluations are necessary, so that an appropriate comparison of the cost effectiveness of the many new drugs that are introduced into the Japanese market each year can be made. In addition to supporting the development of standardised guidelines, the Ministry of Health and Welfare should clarify how pharmacoeconomic data are to be used to aid policy decisions and also mandate the publication of pharmacoeconomic data.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10164057     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199610060-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  8 in total

Review 1.  Economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: a European perspective.

Authors:  M Drummond; F Rutten; A Brenna; C G Pinto; B Horisberger; B Jönsson; C Le Pen; J Rovira; M G von der Schulenburg; H Sintonen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Methodological and conduct principles for pharmacoeconomic research. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.

Authors:  K Clemens; R Townsend; F Luscombe; J Mauskopf; J Osterhaus; J Bobula
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Guidelines for pharmacoeconomic studies. The ways forward.

Authors:  M F Drummond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Pharmaceutical prices, quantities and innovation. Comparing Japan with the US.

Authors:  N Ikegami; W Mitchell; J Penner-Hahn
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Reporting guidelines for economic studies.

Authors:  J Mason; M Drummond
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 6.  Sensitivity analysis in economic evaluation: a review of published studies.

Authors:  A Briggs; M Sculpher
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Report from the Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA). Guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: Canada.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.188

8.  Something rotten in the state of clinical and economic evaluations?

Authors:  N Freemantle; A Maynard
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.046

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Design, analysis and presentation of multinational economic studies: the need for guidance.

Authors:  Francis Pang
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Using economic evaluations to make formulary coverage decisions. So much for guidelines.

Authors:  A H Anis; Y Gagnon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Why has the use of health economic evaluation in Japan lagged behind that in other developed countries?

Authors:  Naoki Ikegami; Michael Drummond; Shunichi Fukuhara; Shuzo Nishimura; George W Torrance; François Schubert
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Why medical care costs in Japan have increased despite declining prices for pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  N Ikegami; S Ikeda; H Kawai
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.981

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.