Literature DB >> 10163432

The UK pharmaceutical market. An overview.

A Towse1.   

Abstract

The National Health Service (NHS) accounts for more than 98% of the UK prescription medicines market, which is the sixth largest pharmaceutical market in the world. Most of this market is driven by the UK's approximately 35,000 general practitioners (GPs). It is an open market, with most leading foreign pharmaceutical companies having a strong presence. While the growth rate of this market has been decelerating, it remains one of the fastest growing components of NHS expenditure. The NHS does not operate any kind of national reimbursement list, but the UK government has adopted several means to keep medicines expenditure under control. These include cash incentives and constraints for GPs relating to expenditure on medicines, individual quarterly updates on GP prescribing, the publication of a list of medicines that cannot be prescribed by GPs, the switching of some prescription-only medicines to over-the-counter medicines, and a co-payment system. The main form of economic regulation in the UK, however, remains the Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme (PPRS). This limits the rate-of-return on capital attributable to medicines sales to the NHS, with the intended rate-of-return being equal to that of UK industry overall. The pharmaceutical industry has generally performed relatively well in the UK market, managing to preserve incentives to innovation. This reflects the fact that UK GPs have been able to maintain their clinical freedom, as well as government recognition of the economic contribution made by the pharmaceutical industry. Current issues of interest in the UK pharmaceutical market context include the future of the PPRS, the debates over the imposition of a national formulary and generic substitution, and over parallel trade, the potential impact of managed-care protocols and computer-based prescribing on pharmaceutical expenditures, and possible political changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10163432     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199600102-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  8 in total

1.  A UK national prescribing list?

Authors:  T Walley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Management of patients with thrombophilia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Drug Ther Bull       Date:  1995-01-19

3.  Alterations in prescribing by general practitioner fundholders: an observational study.

Authors:  R P Wilson; I Buchan; T Walley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-11-18

4.  Patient charges and the utilisation of NHS prescription medicines: some estimates using a cointegration procedure.

Authors:  D Hughes; A McGuire
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Promoting cost effective prescribing. Cost effectiveness studies may not be cost effective.

Authors:  A Towse; N Wells
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-08

6.  Promoting cost effective prescribing.

Authors:  N Freemantle; D Henry; A Maynard; G Torrance
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-04-15

7.  GP fundholding and the costs of prescribing.

Authors:  D K Whynes; D L Baines; K H Tolley
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1995-09

8.  Transferring the costs of expensive treatments from secondary to primary care.

Authors:  B J Crump; R Panton; M F Drummond; M Marchment; R A Hawkes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-02-25
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  The emergence of managed care in Europe. Some thoughts on the politics of healthcare reform.

Authors:  C Elze
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Pharmaceutical price regulation. A study on the impact of the rate-of-return regulation in the UK.

Authors:  J R Borrell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.981

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.