Literature DB >> 10163416

Cost-effective prophylaxis of surgical infections.

S R Norrby1.   

Abstract

There are few formal pharmacoeconomic studies of antibacterial prophylaxis in surgery. An important reason for this is that such prophylaxis is difficult to study, because extremely large patient samples are needed to demonstrate differences or equalities with reasonable statistical power. When the cost effectiveness of various regimens is evaluated, indirect methods must often be used. Clearly, the ideal prophylactic regimen, both clinically and economically, is one that is easy to administer, has a low acquisition cost, can be given as a single dose and provides maximal protection against postoperative infections. However, if and when such a regimen is identified, its universal acceptance and use might have negative ecological consequences (e.g. the selection of resistant organisms in the hospital environment). Thus, the search for the ideal prophylactic regimen must be a continuous process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10163416     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199610020-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  82 in total

1.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery: is an extended-spectrum agent necessary?

Authors:  C Carlson; P Duff
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Antibiotic prophylaxis with cefotaxime in gastroduodenal and biliary surgery.

Authors:  J A Garcia-Rodriguez; J Puig-LaCalle; C Arnau; M Porta; C Vallvé
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Oral ciprofloxacin as prophylaxis in gastroduodenal surgery.

Authors:  C S McArdle; C G Morran; J R Anderson; L Pettit; C G Gemmell; J D Sleigh; G S Tillotson
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Antimicrobial prophylaxis in bowel surgery in The Netherlands.

Authors:  R Janknegt; W J Wijnands; E Stobberingh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  The penetration of cefoxitin into peritoneal fluid.

Authors:  R Wise; I A Donovan; N S Ambrose; J E Allcock
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Antibiotic single-dose prophylaxis of shunt infections.

Authors:  J Blum; M Schwarz; D Voth
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Prophylaxis in cardiac surgery. A controlled randomized comparison between cefazolin and cefuroxime.

Authors:  F Wellens; M Pirlet; R Larbuisson; F De Meireleire; P De Somer
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  CSF shunt infections in children.

Authors:  U Kontny; B Höfling; P Gutjahr; D Voth; M Schwarz; H J Schmitt
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  Double-blind randomized prospective study of the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis for open reduction and internal fixation of closed ankle fractures.

Authors:  G D Paiement; E Renaud; G Dagenais; R A Gosselin
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Clinical trial of cefamandole, cefazolin, and cefuroxime for antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac operations.

Authors:  T R Townsend; B A Reitz; W B Bilker; J G Bartlett
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  2 in total

1.  Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  A M Glenny; F Song
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-06

2.  Using cost of infection as a tool to demonstrate a difference in prophylactic antibiotic efficacy: a prospective randomized comparison of the pharmacoeconomic effectiveness of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime prophylaxis in abdominal surgery.

Authors:  John C Woodfield; Andre M Van Rij; Ross A Pettigrew; Antje van der Linden; Donna Bolt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.352

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.