Literature DB >> 10162905

Seven reasons why you should not categorize continuous data.

T E Dinero1.   

Abstract

I have shown that there are a variety of logical, philosophical, measurement, and statistical reasons why every attempt should be made to measure continuous attributes using measures which reflect that continuity and that following statistical analyses should also retain that continuity. I encourage you to look back at some of the research articles which you have read and see if any of these issues is pertinent. Check out the conclusions and see if they are warranted by the data.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10162905     DOI: 10.1300/J045v08n01_06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Soc Policy        ISSN: 0897-7186


  8 in total

1.  Childhood and adolescent predictors of heavy episodic drinking and alcohol use disorder at ages 21 and 33: a domain-specific cumulative risk model.

Authors:  Jungeun Olivia Lee; Karl G Hill; Katarina Guttmannova; Lacey A Hartigan; Richard F Catalano; J David Hawkins
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.582

2.  Training Load and Its Role in Injury Prevention, Part 2: Conceptual and Methodologic Pitfalls.

Authors:  Franco M Impellizzeri; Alan McCall; Patrick Ward; Luke Bornn; Aaron J Coutts
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Categorisation of continuous risk factors in epidemiological publications: a survey of current practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Joanna E Dobson; Stuart J Pocock
Journal:  Epidemiol Perspect Innov       Date:  2010-10-15

4.  Donor Lung Sequence Number and Survival after Lung Transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Michael O Harhay; Raphaël Porcher; Gabriel Thabut; Michael J Crowther; Thomas DiSanto; Samantha Rubin; Zachary Penfil; Zhou Bing; Jason D Christie; Joshua M Diamond; Edward Cantu
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-03

Review 5.  Sedentary behavior and health outcomes among older adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leandro Fornias Machado de Rezende; Juan Pablo Rey-López; Victor Keihan Rodrigues Matsudo; Olinda do Carmo Luiz
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  The relationship between study strategies and academic performance.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Zhou; Lori Graham; Courtney West
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2016-10-07

7.  Cut points and contexts.

Authors:  Evan L Busch
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.921

8.  Commentary on "high-risk behavior in patients with alcohol dependence".

Authors:  Samir Kumar Praharaj
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.759

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.