Literature DB >> 10160114

Costs, innovation and efficiency in anti-infective therapy.

J L Bootman1, R J Milne.   

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of issues related to the emerging discipline of pharmacoeconomics and its relationship to the outcomes movement. The focus is upon the evolving Management Care Organisation (MCO) and the demands placed upon the pharmaceutical industry as it attempts to provide new innovative anti-infective treatments. Similarly, the challenge is to meet the ever increasing requirements for approval and reimbursement of new anti-infective pharmaceutical products. Outcomes research is playing an increasingly important role in such decisions throughout the world, including the United States. Unfortunately, most decisions and analysis at the national level and within MCOs regarding the adoption and utilisation of pharmaceuticals are rather unsophisticated in terms of the proper utilisation of pharmacoeconomic data. There is a prevalent need to better utilise this information to develop cost-effective disease and therapy intervention models and guidelines. Also, information on the application of pharmacoeconomics for the evaluation of pharmaceutical care services that enhance the cost effectiveness of drug therapy needs to be seriously considered. Specifically, this should include a consideration of the economic consequences of drug-related problems and the potential impact of pharmaceutical care on drug-related morbidity/mortality associated with the treatment of infectious disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10160114     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199600091-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  34 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacoeconomics of genetically engineered drugs.

Authors:  A J Jones-Grizzle; J L Bootman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomics of immunisation: a review.

Authors:  R van den Oever; D de Graeve; B Hepp; A Stroobant; D Walckiers; V Van Casteren; F Van Loock; G Ducoffre; J Dewatripont; P Jacques
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Review of cost-benefit analyses of influenza vaccine.

Authors:  J Perez-Tirse; P A Gross
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Institutional formularies: the relevance of pharmacoeconomic analysis to formulary decisions.

Authors:  R J Lipsy
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Prescription cost sharing: economic and health impacts, and implications for health policy.

Authors:  R A Levy
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Oral ciprofloxacin: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the treatment of serious infections.

Authors:  J A Balfour; D Faulds
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Cost analysis of imipenem-cilastatin versus clindamycin with tobramycin in the treatment of acute intra-abdominal infection.

Authors:  G de Lissovoy; A Elixhauser; B R Luce; J Weschler; P Mowery; J Reblando; J Solomkin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Cost of treatment and prevention of Haemophilus influenzae type b disease. An international perspective.

Authors:  D A Clements
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  What is the cost of nephrotoxicity associated with aminoglycosides?

Authors:  J M Eisenberg; H Koffer; H A Glick; M L Connell; L E Loss; G H Talbot; N H Shusterman; B L Strom
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Should adult tetanus immunization be given as a single vaccination at age 65? A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  D J Balestra; B Littenberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cost effectiveness of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole versus imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  D J Walters; J S Solomkin; J A Paladino
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.981

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.