Literature DB >> 10160049

Comparison of maternal absenteeism and infant illness rates among breast-feeding and formula-feeding women in two corporations.

R Cohen1, M B Mrtek, R G Mrtek.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A comparison was made between breast-feeding and formula-feeding among employed mothers. Absenteeism directly related to child care was examined.
DESIGN: This quasi-experimental study followed convenience samples of breast-feeding and formula-feeding mothers until their infants were weaned or reached 1 year of age.
SETTING: Two corporations with established lactation programs were used. One had approximately 100 births annually among 2400 female employees, and the other had approximately 30 births annually among 1200 female employees.
SUBJECTS: A sample of 101 participants, 59 feeding breast milk and 42 using commercial formula, was composed of employees returning from maternity leave for a medically uncomplicated birth. INTERVENTION: The programs provided counseling by a lactation professional for all participants and facilities to collect and store breast milk. MEASURES: Confidential participant diaries provided descriptive data on infant illnesses and related absenteeism that the lactation consultant verified with health care providers and through employer attendance records. ANALYSIS: Attribute counts of illnesses and absenteeism were reported as percentages. Single degree of freedom chi square tests were used to compare rates between nutrition groups.
RESULTS: Approximately 28% of the infants in the study had no illnesses; 86% of these were breast-fed and 14% were formula-fed. When illnesses occurred, 25% of all 1-day maternal absences were among breast-fed babies and 75% were among the formula-fed group.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study fewer and less severe infant illnesses and less maternal absenteeism was found in the breast-feeding group. This was not an experimental study. Participants were self-selected, and a comparison group was used rather than a true control group. Corroboration of these findings from larger experimental studies is needed to generalize beyond these groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 10160049     DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.2.148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  18 in total

1.  Low breastfeeding rates and public health in the United States.

Authors:  Jacqueline H Wolf
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Exploring Human Resource Managers' Decision-Making Process for Workplace Breastfeeding-Support Benefits Following the Passage of the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Alexandra L MacMillan Uribe; Tracie A Bolton; Kaitland R Woelky; Beth H Olson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-10

3.  Neighborhood Disadvantage and Neighborhood Affluence: Associations with Breastfeeding Practices in Urban Areas.

Authors:  Jennifer Yourkavitch; Jennifer B Kane; Gandarvaka Miles
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-04

4.  Is there competition between breast-feeding and maternal employment?

Authors:  B Roe; L A Whittington; S B Fein; M F Teisl
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1999-05

5.  Meeting the challenge: using policy to improve children's health.

Authors:  Charles Adam Brush; Maggie M Kelly; Denise Green; Marcus Gaffney; John Kattwinkel; Molly French
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Effect of components of a workplace lactation program on breastfeeding duration among employees of a public-sector employer.

Authors:  Jane A Johnston Balkam; Karin Cadwell; Sara B Fein
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-07

Review 7.  The rationale for adopting current international breastfeeding guidelines in South Africa.

Authors:  Aila Meyer; Dorothy A van der Spuy; Lisanne M du Plessis
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  Turning Chutes into Ladders for Women Faculty: A Review and Roadmap for Equity in Academia.

Authors:  Michelle I Cardel; Emily Dhurandhar; Ceren Yarar-Fisher; Monica Foster; Bertha Hidalgo; Leslie A McClure; Sherry Pagoto; Nathanial Brown; Dori Pekmezi; Noha Sharafeldin; Amanda L Willig; Christine Angelini
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 9.  Treatment of opioid-dependent pregnant women: clinical and research issues.

Authors:  Hendree E Jones; Peter R Martin; Sarah H Heil; Karol Kaltenbach; Peter Selby; Mara G Coyle; Susan M Stine; Kevin E O'Grady; Amelia M Arria; Gabriele Fischer
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2008-01-14

10.  Employee perception of breastfeeding-friendly support and benefits of breastfeeding as a predictor of intention to use breast-pumping breaks after returning to work among employed mothers.

Authors:  Su-Ying Tsai
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.