Literature DB >> 10159743

Physicians' experiences with prehospital do-not-resuscitate orders in North Carolina.

D A Travers1, G Mears.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many states are implementing prehospital do-not-resuscitate (DNR) programs through legislation or by state or local protocol. There are no outcome studies in the literature regarding the utilization of, access to, or barriers to prehospital DNR programs, nor are there studies that evaluated whether they meet the patients' needs. STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To explore physicians' perceptions of the utilization of, access to, and barriers to a southeastern state's prehospital DNR program, and to identify key professional groups needing information about prehospital DNR issues.
METHODS: A convenience sample survey and a descriptive review using retrospective, self-report questionnaires sent to all physicians who requested and obtained a supply of the state's out-of-facility DNR forms in 1993.
RESULTS: Respondents reported that the most common terminal conditions for patients with prehospital DNR orders are cancer and multiple chronic diseases in elderly patients. More than half of the physicians recalled that enrolled patients had engaged the services of emergency medical services (EMS), most often because the patients' conditions worsened, and the families were uncertain about what to do. Most of the enrolled patients have at least one other DNR order in another health-care setting, and are at home with hospice care or home-health care at the time of the prehospital DNR order implementation. The most frequent barrier to honoring dying patients' wishes in the prehospital environment is a lack of knowledge of prehospital issues by patients, families, primary care physicians, and nursing home staff. Ninety-eight percent of the respondents support a single, universal DNR order that would apply across all health-care settings.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients, families, and key health-care professional groups need to be targeted with educational programs regarding prehospital DNR issues. Primary care physicians, using the current prehospital DNR program, support more comprehensive approaches to DNR orders across health-care settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10159743     DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x00042709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med        ISSN: 1049-023X            Impact factor:   2.040


  3 in total

1.  CPR or DNR? End-of-life decision in Korean cancer patients: a single center's experience.

Authors:  Do-Youn Oh; Jee-Hyun Kim; Dong-Wan Kim; Seock-Ah Im; Tae-You Kim; Dae Seog Heo; Yung-Jue Bang; Noe Kyeong Kim
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  The importance of reliable information exchange in emergency practices: a misunderstanding that was uncovered before it was too late.

Authors:  Halvor Nordby
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  The do-not-resuscitate order: incidence of documentation in the medical records of cancer patients referred for palliative radiotherapy.

Authors:  N M E Bradley; E Sinclair; C Danjoux; E A Barnes; M N Tsao; M Farhadian; A Yee; E Chow
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.