Literature DB >> 1015889

Proximal gastric vagotomy: effects of two operative techniques on clinical and gastric secretory results.

G A Hallenbeck, J J Gleysteen, J S Aldrete, R L Slaughter.   

Abstract

PGV performed in 39 patients by separating the lesser omentum from the stomach beginning 6 or 7 cm proximal to the pylorus and skeletonizing the distal 1 to 2 cm of esophagus was followed by 15.4% of proven and 10.2 of suspected recurrent ulcers. Insulin tests were done during the first 3 months postoperatively on 31 of the patients, including the 6 with proven and the 4 with suspected recurrent ulcers. The peak acid output to insulin minus tha basal acid output (PAOI-BAO) was less than 5 mEq/hr in 16 cases (52%) and from 5 to 25 mEq/hr in the remaining 15 cases. In 6 patients with proven recurrent ulcer, PAOI-BAO averaged 21.9 mEq/hr (range, 11.3 to 41.8); in the 4 patients with suspected recurrence, 9.5 (range, 4.4 to 11.8). The operative technique was changed in one respect; the distal 5 to 7.5 cm of the esophagus was skeletonized. In 14 patients, the mean PAOI-BAO +/- S.E. within 3 months of PGV was 1985 +/- 0.7 mEq/hr, and 13 of 14 values were less than 5 mEq/hr. One patient developed recurrent ulcer and required re-operation; this patient's value for PAO-BAO was 1.8 mEq/hr. The results show quantitatively that great differences in the completeness of PGV result from differences in the periesophageal dissection and emphasize its importance if optimal results are to be obtained and, especially, if the efficacy of the operation is to be judged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1015889      PMCID: PMC1345437          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197610000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  19 in total

1.  Laboratory criteria for the completeness of vagotomy.

Authors:  W H BACHRACH
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1962-12

2.  A technique for highly selective (parietal cell or proximal gastric) vagotomy for duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  J C Goligher
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Selective proximal vagotomy with and without pyloroplasty.

Authors:  C Wastell; J F Colin; J I MacNaughton; J Gleeson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1972-01-01

4.  Vagotomy: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  C T Bombeck; R E Condon; B Miller; L M Nyhus
Journal:  Surg Forum       Date:  1974

5.  Highly selective vagotomy.

Authors:  D Johnston
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  A selective stain to detect the vagus nerve in the operation of vagotomy.

Authors:  M Lee
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Proceedings: Parietal cell vagotomy without drainage. Early evaluation of results in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  P H Jordan
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1974-04

8.  Clinical results of parietal cell vagotomy (highly selective vagotomy) two to four years after operation.

Authors:  E Amdrup; H E Jensen; D Johnston; B E Walker; J C Goligher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The discriminatory ability of gastric acid secretion tests in the diagnosis of recurrence after truncal vagotomy and drainage for duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  O Kronborg
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Clinical appraisal of insulin gastric analysis.

Authors:  S J Stempien; E R Lee; A E Dagradi
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1968-01
View more
  15 in total

1.  Proximal gastric vagotomy compared with vagotomy and antrectomy and selective gastric vagotomy and pyloroplasty.

Authors:  J L Sawyers; J L Herrington; D P Burney
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Physiological outcome following laparoscopic highly selective vagotomy. A controlled study in a pig model.

Authors:  J R Bessell; G Pike; G G Jamieson; G J Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Recurrent peptic ulcers.

Authors:  D Johnston; R L Blackett
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Progression of changes in gastric emptying of hypertonic liquids after proximal gastric vagotomy. An experimental study.

Authors:  J J Gleysteen; J H Kalbfleisch
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  [Management of a systematic follow-up clinic (author's transl)].

Authors:  H Troidl
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1978-11

6.  Effective of highly selective vagotomy upon the lower oesophageal sphincter.

Authors:  J G Temple; R J Goodall; D J Hay; D Miller
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Perforated duodenal ulcer managed by proximal gastric vagotomy and suture plication.

Authors:  J L Sawyers; J L Herrington
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Effect of selective proximal vagotomy and truncal vagotomy on gastric acid and serum gastrin responses to a meal in duodenal ulcer patients.

Authors:  J C Thompson; W S Lowder; J T Peurifoy; J S Swierczek; P L Rayford
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Division and repair of the sphincteric mechanism at the gastric outlet in emergency operations for bleeding peptic ulcer. A new technique for use in combination with suture ligation of the bleeding point and highly selective vagotomy.

Authors:  D Johnston
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  An interim report on parietal cell vagotomy versus selective vagotomy and antrectomy for treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  P H Jordan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.