Literature DB >> 10157401

The ambiguous relationship between practice variation and appropriateness of care: an agenda for further research.

A F Casparie1.   

Abstract

The analysis of variation in the use of health care services, and particularly of practice variation, has been the subject of renewed interest because of the view that the inappropriate use of procedures could be a major cause of these differences. In this article, recent literature is reviewed and the results of personal research are described on both the variation in care provision and on appropriateness assessment. In the few studies which have focussed on both subjects no evidence has yet been found to suggest that practice variation is to be explained by differences in appropriateness rates. However, there are still many methodological pitfalls in both variation analyses (statistical problems) and appropriateness assessment (reliability of the judgement), implying that this conclusion is far from definitive. More research should therefore be conducted on methodological questions of variation analysis and appropriateness assessment. Furthermore in variation analysis the relative contribution of all potential determinants has to be studied on the various levels of care provision. Finally, to study the relationship between practice variation and appropriateness of care, the clinical problem and not the procedure should be the starting point.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10157401     DOI: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)00787-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  6 in total

1.  The best of times and worst of times.

Authors:  K C Stange
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Whom should we profile? Examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups, and health care facilities.

Authors:  Sarah L Krein; Timothy P Hofer; Eve A Kerr; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Ethnic specific recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: a first exploratory comparison between guidelines from the USA, Canada, the UK, and the Netherlands.

Authors:  D R Manna; M A Bruijnzeels; H G A Mokkink; M Berg
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-10

Review 4.  [The problem of medical overuse : Finding a definition and solutions].

Authors:  T Gamstätter
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Sources of variability in uncertain medical decisions in the ICU: a process tracing study.

Authors:  O Kostopoulou; M Wildman
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-08

6.  Appropriateness for Total Joint Replacement: Perspectives of Decision-Makers.

Authors:  Nathalie Clavel; Carolyn De Coster; Marie-Pascale Pomey; Claudia Sanmartin; Éric Bohm; Michael J Dunbar; C Y Frank; Gillian Hawker; Tom Noseworthy
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.