Literature DB >> 10156394

Attitudes and behaviors towards clinical guidelines: the clinicians' perspective.

C D Mansfield1.   

Abstract

Objectives--To find out what attitudes hospital doctors have towards the culture of clinical guidelines; to ascertain perceived knowledge and use of clinical guidelines; and to investigate why hospital doctors think that clinical guidelines may not be used and how they think that the use of guidelines can be encouraged. Design--Postal questionnaire survey be tween October 1993 and January 1994. Setting--Hospitals within Oxford region. Subjects--409 doctors of all grades working in one of six specialties (anaesthetics, paediatrics, general surgery, general medicine, obstetrics and gynaecology and accident and emergency medicine). 47 were randomly picked as part of the pilot study, 362 were extracted from hospital staffing lists. Results--268 clinicians (66%) responded to the questionnaire. Most respondents (77%, 208) expressed welcoming attitudes towards guidelines but 51%(136) perceived the attitudes of their colleagues as being less favourable. Over three quarters of respondents claimed to use guidelines at least once a month. Most respondents learnt about guidelines from discussions with their peers (50%, 134 respondents) or senior doctors 37%, 99) or from journals (39%, 105). Reasons why guidelines may not be used included being unaware of particular guidelines (80%, 213 respondents) and the fact that guidelines had been poorly developed (64%, 171) or were impractical (49%, 132). The best ways to encourage the use of guidelines were thought to be encouragement from senior doctors (72%, 193 respondents) and peers (59%, 157) and by monitoring behaviour and providing feedback (68%, 181). Conclusion--The decision to use a guide line was based on the perceived value of each guideline and was influenced by other clinicians' behaviour. The results provide an insight into aspects of dissemination and implementation which are perceived as influential by the recipients of guidelines.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 10156394      PMCID: PMC1055335          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.4.4.250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Care        ISSN: 0963-8172


  12 in total

1.  Guidance on guidelines.

Authors:  A Haines; G Feder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-03

2.  National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Implementing guidelines in general practice care.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-09

4.  Implementing clinical guidelines. Guidelines may not be cost effective.

Authors:  A McColl
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-09-11

5.  Initiating, conducting and maintaining guidelines development programs.

Authors:  R S Hayward; A Laupacis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm.

Authors:  D A Prentice; D T Miller
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1993-02

7.  Clinical practice guidelines: weapons for patients, or shields for MDs?

Authors:  A Gilmore
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Cost containment and changing physicians' practice behavior. Can the fox learn to guard the chicken coop?

Authors:  J M Eisenberg; S V Williams
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Wanted: guidelines that doctors will follow.

Authors:  T Delamothe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-24

10.  The use of continuous quality improvement methods in the development and dissemination of medical practice guidelines.

Authors:  L R Burns; M Denton; S Goldfein; L Warrick; B Morenz; B Sales
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1992-12
View more
  14 in total

1.  Practice guidelines in Finland: availability and quality.

Authors:  H Varonen; M Mäkelä
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1997-06

2.  Clinical guidelines: quantity without quality.

Authors:  M Sudlow; R Thomson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1997-06

3.  Attitudes toward practice guidelines among intensive care unit personnel: a cross-sectional anonymous survey.

Authors:  Dave Quiros; Susan Lin; Elaine L Larson
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.210

4.  Improving access to cancer guidelines: feedback from health care professionals.

Authors:  I S Sahota; X Kostaras; N A Hagen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  What are hospitals doing about clinical guidelines?

Authors:  E B Renvoize; S M Hampshaw; J M Pinder; P Ayres
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1997-12

6.  The uptake and costs of guidelines for stroke in a district of southern England.

Authors:  C D Wolfe; N Stojcevic; A G Rudd; F Warburton; R Beech
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Attitude and opinion towards essential medicine formulary.

Authors:  Sangeeta Sharma; Reeta Kh; R Roy Chaudhury
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.200

8.  Ethnicity and socioeconomic status: missing in research means missing in clinical guidance.

Authors:  Eleanor Beard; Sharon Dixon; Tanvi Rai; Gail Hayward
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2021-06-30

9.  What doctors think about the impact of managed care tools on quality of care, costs, autonomy, and relations with patients.

Authors:  Marie Deom; Thomas Agoritsas; Patrick A Bovier; Thomas V Perneger
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Physicians' propensity to collaborate and their attitude towards EBM: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Daniele Mascia; Americo Cicchetti; Maria Pia Fantini; Gianfranco Damiani; Walter Ricciardi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.