Literature DB >> 10154316

Implementing a system of care: findings from the Fort Bragg evaluation project.

C A Heflinger1.   

Abstract

The Implementation Study of the Fort Bragg Evaluation documented how the Demonstration was executed and whether it met the expectations of the continuum of care philosophy upon which it was based. Based on the theory-driven and component approaches to program evaluation, a case study methodology was employed. First, the theories and assumptions about the Demonstration were explicated to derive a program model. Next, the program-as-implemented was compared to the program-as-planned. Barriers responsible for diluting full-scale implementation were documented. This study provides a comprehensive description of how the Demonstration was put into place and the evidence necessary to conclude that the Demonstration was executed with high fidelity, despite barriers, to provide an excellent test of the program theory.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10154316     DOI: 10.1007/bf02518640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ment Health Adm        ISSN: 0092-8623


  2 in total

1.  A model for measuring the implementation of community support programs: results from three sites.

Authors:  J S Brekke; M A Test
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1992-06

Review 2.  Public and private responsibility for mental health services.

Authors:  L Bickman; P R Dokecki
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1989-08
  2 in total
  7 in total

1.  The Fort Bragg Demonstration Project: a look back.

Authors:  M L Paris
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1996

2.  The evaluation of the Fort Bragg Demonstration Project: an alternative interpretation of the findings.

Authors:  R M Friedman; B J Burns
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1996

3.  Policy implications of the evaluation of the Fort Bragg Child and Adolescent Mental Health Demonstration Project.

Authors:  L Behar
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1996

4.  Comment on the final report of the Fort Bragg Evaluation Project.

Authors:  T W Lane
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1996

5.  Reinterpreting the Fort Bragg Evaluation findings: the message does not change.

Authors:  L Bickman
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1996

6.  A focused approach to assessing program fidelity.

Authors:  Laura Griner Hill; Katherine Maucione; Brianne K Hood
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2006-09-13

7.  What happens when capitated behavioral health comes to town? The transition from the Fort Bragg demonstration to a capitated managed behavioral health contract.

Authors:  C A Heflinger; D A Northrup
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.505

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.