Literature DB >> 10153481

Hospital payment arrangements to encourage efficiency: the case of Victoria, Australia.

S J Duckett1.   

Abstract

The casemix funding arrangements introduced in Victoria on 1 July 1993 represent a significant departure from the previous approaches to public hospital funding in Australia. They are designed to change the economic incentives on hospitals by linking payment to the number and case complexity of patients treated. The new funding arrangements include a combination of fixed and variable payments to hospitals for inpatient services. Outpatient services remain funded on a historical basis. Special payments are made for teaching and research functions. Total payments to hospitals are capped through operation of an 'Additional Throughput Pool' which allows price to fluctuate inversely with volume to ensure an expenditure limit. Because of operations of specific conditions on the Additional Throughput Pool, hospitals were given an incentive to reduce waiting lists. Despite the success in reducing waiting lists and budgets, there are a number of problems with the casemix approach including both technical issues (how are payment rates to be updated?; the failure to address problems of capital) and ethical issues. These are discussed in the paper.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 10153481     DOI: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)94014-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  8 in total

1.  Practical experience with bed occupancy management and planning systems: an Australian view.

Authors:  M Mackay
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2001-02

2.  The risk-adjusted vision beyond casemix (DRG) funding in Australia. International lessons in high complexity and capitation.

Authors:  Kathryn M Antioch; Michael K Walsh
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2004-06

3.  Risk adjustment policy options for casemix funding: international lessons in financing reform.

Authors:  Kathryn M Antioch; Randall P Ellis; Steve Gillett; Daniel Borovnicar; Ric P Marshall
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2007-02-02

Review 4.  An economic analysis of money follows the patient.

Authors:  B McElroy; A Murphy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Fire, Aim… Ready? Alberta's Big Bang Approach to Healthcare Disintegration.

Authors:  Cam Donaldson
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-08

Review 6.  A narrative synthesis of illustrative evidence on effects of capitation payment for primary care: lessons for Ghana and other low/middle-income countries.

Authors:  Francis-Xavier Andoh-Adjei; Ernst Spaan; Felix A Asante; Sylvester A Mensah; Koos van der Velden
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2016-12

Review 7.  Health Statistics in Australia: What We Know and Do Not Know.

Authors:  Richard Madden; Nicola Fortune; Julie Gordon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Design of price incentives for adjunct policy goals in formula funding for hospitals and health services.

Authors:  Stephen J Duckett
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.