Literature DB >> 10150748

Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology: do we understand the commitment?

F DeRuyter1.   

Abstract

Evaluating assistive technology (AT) services to demonstrate quality or to measure outcomes is the ethical obligation of the entire AT community. Accountability must be accepted by all stakeholders in order to evaluate all aspects of service delivery. Developing an integrated system will require addressing issues that the AT community has not previously had to face. These challenges have been highlighted.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 10150748     DOI: 10.1080/10400435.1995.10132246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assist Technol        ISSN: 1040-0435


  4 in total

1.  Improving the sensitivity of the time trade-off method: results of an experiment using chained TTO questions.

Authors:  G C Morrison; A Neilson; M Malek
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2002-02

2.  Exploratory study of perceived quality of life with implanted standing neuroprostheses.

Authors:  Loretta M Rohde; Bette R Bonder; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

3.  Current and future AAC research considerations for adults with acquired cognitive and communication impairments.

Authors:  Melanie Fried-Oken; David R Beukelman; Karen Hux
Journal:  Assist Technol       Date:  2011

4.  User satisfaction with orthotic devices and service in taiwan.

Authors:  Chiung-Ling Chen; Ya-Ling Teng; Shu-Zon Lou; Chung-Hui Lin; Fen-Fen Chen; Kwok-Tak Yeung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.