Literature DB >> 10149177

What makes a shock wave efficient in lithotripsy?

B Granz1, G Köhler.   

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was the connection of quantitative shock wave parameters to stone fragmentation in lithotripsy. We developed an in vitro procedure where eroded craters in artificial stones could be measured with respect to their geometric outlines. By altering the components of an electrodynamic ultrasonic source we obtained a multitude of shock wave foci with physical parameters covering a wide range. With these foci different craters were formed and measured. With a correlation method the quantitative stone erosion could be connected with single physical parameters of the shock waves. As a result we found strict linear dependence of the volume erosion on the effective energy. On the other hand, the peak pressure in the focus revealed to be a poor parameter to qualify the fragmentation efficiency of a lithotripter. Additionally the contribution of the rise time of the shock wave to stone erosion is of negligible influence.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 10149177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stone Dis        ISSN: 1059-9509


  16 in total

1.  Effect of lithotripter focal width on stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jun Qin; W Neal Simmons; Georgy Sankin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in a rat knee osteoarthritis model: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Volkan Yılmaz; Ömer Karadaş; Taner Dandinoğlu; Ebru Umay; Aytül Çakçı; Arif Kenan Tan
Journal:  Eur J Rheumatol       Date:  2017-06-01

3.  In vitro effects of high-energy pulsed ultrasound on human squamous cell carcinoma cells.

Authors:  H Iro; T Feigl; J Zenk; F Waldfahrer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Past, present and future].

Authors:  C Chaussy; T Bergsdorf; S Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  A heuristic model of stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Nathan B Smith; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Shock-Induced Damage and Dynamic Fracture in Cylindrical Bodies Submerged in Liquid.

Authors:  S Cao; Y Zhang; D Liao; P Zhong; K G Wang
Journal:  Int J Solids Struct       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.900

7.  Improving the lens design and performance of a contemporary electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter.

Authors:  Andreas Neisius; Nathan B Smith; Georgy Sankin; Nicholas John Kuntz; John Francis Madden; Daniel E Fovargue; Sorin Mitran; Michael Eric Lipkin; Walter Neal Simmons; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Recent advances in lithotripsy technology and treatment strategies: A systematic review update.

Authors:  H E Elmansy; J E Lingeman
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 6.071

9.  Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis: randomised controlled multicentre trial.

Authors:  Michael Haake; Mathias Buch; Carsten Schoellner; Felix Goebel; Martin Vogel; Ingo Mueller; Jörg Hausdorf; Karin Zamzow; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Hans-Helge Mueller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-12

Review 10.  Shock wave lithotripsy: the new phoenix?

Authors:  Andreas Neisius; Michael E Lipkin; Jens J Rassweiler; Pei Zhong; Glenn M Preminger; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.